WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.445 --> 00:00:11.275
Welcome to all that good for the workshop on digital resources, which will be presented this afternoon by Kelly McGrath this is David frehaska at the University of Akron and I'll be the moderator for this session.

2
00:00:11.935 --> 00:00:20.425
Those of you to follow up all that on social media attendees. Are welcome to post on Twitter anything about the conference by using the hashtag olack at 40.

3
00:00:22.199 --> 00:00:31.710
Before we begin the workshop, I'd like to share some housekeeping items about how this session will be conducted. Please note that the recession that the session is being recorded.

4
00:00:32.880 --> 00:00:41.039
All content associated with this session, including the recording resources, and slides would become available after the conference is over.

5
00:00:42.929 --> 00:00:53.460
Please make sure to fill out the workshop survey after the workshop presented, you will need to click on the blue continue button in order to view the survey we greatly appreciate your feedback.

6
00:00:54.899 --> 00:01:06.120
Attendees are muted upon entry to the workshop if you were having trouble hearing the session, please digest your settings by going to the audio and video menu where you can test your speakers and microphone.

7
00:01:10.170 --> 00:01:20.340
For those attendees who would like to see the live captioning for this session, please click on the blue continue button on the right hand panel for Webex associated with external site message.

8
00:01:20.635 --> 00:01:31.614
If the external site message is not displayed, please click on the 3 dots at the bottom right? Corner every Webex stream and select multimedia viewer. Once the blue continue button appears click on it.

9
00:01:31.674 --> 00:01:36.655
You will see the cap app website, which will provide all the captions for the session.

10
00:01:37.079 --> 00:01:44.849
For those who do not want to see the captions, you can click on the X button within the multimedia viewer to eliminate the panel.

11
00:01:51.599 --> 00:02:06.594
Once you begin to see the captions, you can modify the settings use. The toolbar is shown on the top of this slide. We're clicking on the letter a, with the up and down triangle will decrease or increase the font size. Can also click on the pencil icon to change the color of the text.

12
00:02:06.900 --> 00:02:16.530
Or click on the page icon to change the color of the background for the captioning. If you were, like, additional customizations beside these click on the gear icon.

13
00:02:16.530 --> 00:02:21.090
The 2 images in the bottom of the slide provide all the options available.

14
00:02:23.430 --> 00:02:36.025
For this workshop, you have 2 options for submitting questions and comments library a break in the middle of the workshop is seated by a question and answer segment. And of course, there'll be another question and answer a segment. At the end.

15
00:02:36.534 --> 00:02:45.384
I'm Kelly asks for questions the host will allow participants to be unmuted by raising their hand. The moderator will call your name and the host will unmute you.

16
00:02:46.080 --> 00:02:51.479
Once your exchange for the speaker is complete, the host will mute you again and allow the next person to speak.

17
00:02:51.479 --> 00:02:56.460
In order to raise your hand, click on the raise hand icon in the participants.

18
00:02:56.460 --> 00:03:02.520
Panel make sure to click on participants if it is not visible in your Webex window.

19
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:13.199
Please make sure to lower your hand as you have completed your interaction with the speaker in Webex you do this by clicking again on the hand icon and the participant's panel.

20
00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:21.205
The check can also be used to communicate with the speaker, please be sure to choose every 1 and the 2 drop down for all attendees to see your message.

21
00:03:21.865 --> 00:03:30.504
The moderator will also communicate any questions for Kelly that are sent through chat questions regarding technical issues with web. Actually be sent directly to the host.

22
00:03:31.050 --> 00:03:35.610
In the drop down menu for 2 within the chat, select toast.

23
00:03:38.639 --> 00:03:42.659
Now, what I would like to present your speaker for the workshop calima grass.

24
00:03:43.014 --> 00:03:56.395
Tell you is the metadata management library, and at the University of Oregon, she has an experience to me to get media catalog has been active and all that for many years. She has a former chair of cap C and it's currently all liaison to the.

25
00:03:58.074 --> 00:04:11.485
She is particularly interested in ways to make library metadata, more useful for humans and for machines and ways to design discovery interfaces to make better use of library metadata without further ado. Here's calima. Crass.

26
00:04:22.345 --> 00:04:28.524
I'm trying to pass it now. I have to remember to mute myself and I'm talking to my pass it to, you.

27
00:04:29.939 --> 00:04:34.889
Okay, Kelly, you should have the ball now and then your slide should also be showing.

28
00:04:34.889 --> 00:04:39.269
Okay, is everybody seen my slides now? Yes, we are.

29
00:04:39.269 --> 00:04:44.608
You are all right you mean the 1st, technical hurdle over.

30
00:04:44.608 --> 00:04:51.119
So, thank you everybody for coming to this workshop on cataloguing digital resources.

31
00:05:00.509 --> 00:05:12.689
Sorry about that. I clicked the wrong thing. Let's see here 1 took digital resources is a broad topic that can encompass encompass many things.

32
00:05:12.689 --> 00:05:15.718
And I'm only going to cover a few today.

33
00:05:15.718 --> 00:05:18.959
Time to spend about half the time on streaming media.

34
00:05:18.959 --> 00:05:23.968
But I'm not actually going to tell you everything that you need to know about catalog and streaming media.

35
00:05:23.968 --> 00:05:29.399
Since you've already either attended or have the option to listen later to.

36
00:05:29.399 --> 00:05:35.038
The excellent workshops by J, whites and others and cataloging audio and video recordings.

37
00:05:35.038 --> 00:05:38.668
So, in my limited time today I'm going to cover things.

38
00:05:38.668 --> 00:05:47.309
That are unique to streaming media or where I think there's something special that you should think about while cataloguing streaming media.

39
00:05:47.309 --> 00:05:55.348
And then I'm also going to talk a little bit about blogs and podcasts, and I'll end with a section on tangible digital resources.

40
00:05:55.348 --> 00:05:59.819
Such as C. D ROMs USP flash drives and play always.

41
00:05:59.819 --> 00:06:09.928
Before I start, I would be remiss to not mention olack, streaming media, best practices.

42
00:06:09.928 --> 00:06:14.848
Which are an excellent and thorough resource and provides many examples.

43
00:06:14.848 --> 00:06:23.968
And the streaming media best practices will go through cataloging streaming media in a much more comprehensive and systematic way.

44
00:06:23.968 --> 00:06:27.358
That what I'm going to do today, where I'm just going to.

45
00:06:27.358 --> 00:06:30.928
Um, as I said, focus on some of those.

46
00:06:30.928 --> 00:06:36.329
Maybe a trickier or more interesting points and on the points that have more to do.

47
00:06:36.329 --> 00:06:41.968
With the streaming side of things, then the media side of things, maybe.

48
00:06:43.528 --> 00:06:52.139
So, to start with the very basics, what is streaming media? So, streaming media is audio or video.

49
00:06:52.139 --> 00:07:04.798
That is accessible via the Internet, and it can be contrasted with downloadable files, which is the primary alternative for obtaining media content via the Internet.

50
00:07:04.798 --> 00:07:09.298
And you can consume streaming media in real time.

51
00:07:09.298 --> 00:07:13.408
Because a little bit of content is downloaded into a local buffer.

52
00:07:13.408 --> 00:07:18.598
And you can start watching streaming media without having to wait for the entire file to download.

53
00:07:18.598 --> 00:07:22.798
And after you've watched that bit, it's erased from your local device.

54
00:07:22.798 --> 00:07:29.069
And most of the video and audio content that you deal with is a catalog will be screaming.

55
00:07:29.069 --> 00:07:35.038
So, streaming, it makes it better experience for the user, because they don't have to wait for all the content to download.

56
00:07:35.038 --> 00:07:42.269
Before they can start watching or listening, and they also don't have to have massive, massive storage and their local device.

57
00:07:42.269 --> 00:07:53.399
To save the entire file rights holders also like this model, because they don't want you to end up with the entire file downloaded on your device that said from a catalog perspective.

58
00:07:53.399 --> 00:07:57.238
Describing streaming and non streaming media. That's downloadable.

59
00:07:57.238 --> 00:08:00.298
It's not significantly different.

60
00:08:00.298 --> 00:08:04.468
Different, especially if you're following the provider neutral model.

61
00:08:04.468 --> 00:08:12.298
So, the other background topic that I'd like to cover is provide a neutral records.

62
00:08:12.298 --> 00:08:15.778
Provider neutral records are an important concept.

63
00:08:15.778 --> 00:08:22.858
If you're cataloging in a shared database, like, work at the program for cooperative cataloging.

64
00:08:22.858 --> 00:08:27.749
Provide a neutral record guidelines are available website.

65
00:08:27.749 --> 00:08:31.288
And the basic concept of the provider neutral record.

66
00:08:31.288 --> 00:08:35.969
Is that there should be just 1 vehicle that graphic record for.

67
00:08:35.969 --> 00:08:41.278
If they say equivalent manifestations, regardless of platform or provider.

68
00:08:45.208 --> 00:08:53.308
So the provider neutral standard is meant for shared cataloging and you can do whatever you like in your local catalog.

69
00:08:53.308 --> 00:08:58.918
Some Atlas has have limitations that make provide a neutral records difficult to manage.

70
00:08:58.918 --> 00:09:04.828
And if you load vendor records, you may have noticed that they generally are not provider neutral.

71
00:09:04.828 --> 00:09:11.999
At least not for streaming videos, the provider neutral guidelines address our real problem.

72
00:09:11.999 --> 00:09:16.739
The problem with duplicates or near duplicates for online resources.

73
00:09:16.739 --> 00:09:21.028
At provider, mutual records to attempt to provide a better experience.

74
00:09:21.028 --> 00:09:28.859
For both catalogs and end users by saving them the time of waiting to many essentially similar records.

75
00:09:28.859 --> 00:09:32.818
If you paint cataloguing for a long time, like me.

76
00:09:32.818 --> 00:09:38.099
You may remember the time when every vendor's E book version of the same book got its own record.

77
00:09:38.099 --> 00:09:44.038
And if you think there are a lot of duplicates in wildcat now, they haven't seen anything.

78
00:09:44.038 --> 00:09:48.389
However, well intentioned it is though.

79
00:09:48.389 --> 00:09:58.229
Provider mutual record model really is just a clutch that tries to work within the limitations of our current flat Mark environment.

80
00:09:58.229 --> 00:10:02.278
And it does have some significant drawbacks.

81
00:10:02.278 --> 00:10:07.318
So the provider neutral record, best work pretty well for E, books.

82
00:10:07.318 --> 00:10:10.889
At least in my experience, and there are a few reasons for this.

83
00:10:10.889 --> 00:10:16.649
1, is that with ebooks most of the time you have the contextual information that you need.

84
00:10:16.649 --> 00:10:20.999
In order to identify a 1 to 1 match between manifestations.

85
00:10:20.999 --> 00:10:27.749
So most of the E, books that libraries acquire are PDFs or other facsimile, like, productions.

86
00:10:27.749 --> 00:10:34.859
And these include what an interesting blog post refers to his parrot textual information.

87
00:10:34.859 --> 00:10:37.979
Such as the cover title page.

88
00:10:37.979 --> 00:10:44.729
Publication information, and for eBooks, usually both the full text of the actual content.

89
00:10:44.729 --> 00:10:47.849
And the para, textual content is reproduced.

90
00:10:47.849 --> 00:10:51.719
Eva also have the advantage of having a widely used.

91
00:10:51.719 --> 00:10:56.009
Standardized identifier from manifestations.

92
00:10:56.009 --> 00:11:00.269
Which often appears on records for both the print and book versions.

93
00:11:00.269 --> 00:11:04.948
So the provider neutral record.

94
00:11:04.948 --> 00:11:10.109
My experience also mostly works for a commercial streaming audio.

95
00:11:10.109 --> 00:11:14.879
You don't get all the pair of textual information from the tangible manifestation.

96
00:11:14.879 --> 00:11:19.469
But you usually get a lot of it in these examples.

97
00:11:19.469 --> 00:11:23.278
The vendor has provided an image of the front of the album cover.

98
00:11:23.278 --> 00:11:33.119
And links to the aligner notes, they also provide the label name and the original release date. They may also provide a publisher number of some sort.

99
00:11:33.119 --> 00:11:36.989
So, there's often enough information to link the streaming album.

100
00:11:36.989 --> 00:11:44.369
To a specific tangible manifestation, or to determine whether 2 different links are describing the same outcome.

101
00:11:44.369 --> 00:11:49.408
So, video distribution works differently.

102
00:11:49.408 --> 00:11:54.989
Add streaming video platforms tend not to provide this kind of per textual information.

103
00:11:54.989 --> 00:12:01.168
You know, even if the streaming video is derived from a specific tangible manifestation.

104
00:12:01.168 --> 00:12:08.009
You don't usually have the information to make that connection.

105
00:12:08.009 --> 00:12:14.698
Because most of the information from the tangible carrier, or it's packaging is not reproduced.

106
00:12:14.698 --> 00:12:24.269
And as you can see from these examples, different platforms, provide wildly different metadata on their video landing pages.

107
00:12:24.269 --> 00:12:32.129
Once you get beyond the basics, the date that is provided is often the date of the original film.

108
00:12:32.129 --> 00:12:40.288
And only the Alexander street press example, and I put right as anything that looks like it might be a citation for a physical format.

109
00:12:40.288 --> 00:12:50.009
Not only from time demand in the lower right. Has any sort of identifier, but this item number appears on both the manifestations.

110
00:12:50.009 --> 00:12:54.418
So, it does not serve to identify a specific manifestation.

111
00:12:54.418 --> 00:13:01.288
This problem with an item number linking to more than 1 manifestation. Sometimes also occurs with audio recordings.

112
00:13:01.288 --> 00:13:09.808
So just a little more background information on provider, mutual records before we.

113
00:13:09.808 --> 00:13:13.708
Get into the cataloguing a little more.

114
00:13:13.708 --> 00:13:16.918
How do you recognize a provider neutral record?

115
00:13:16.918 --> 00:13:22.288
So, in theory they should be coded with a p and E.

116
00:13:22.288 --> 00:13:29.759
But it is not uncommon for vendors to add this code, even the record when the record's not actually provide our mutual.

117
00:13:29.759 --> 00:13:36.269
Provider neutral records should also have some sort of 588 description based on node.

118
00:13:36.269 --> 00:13:41.519
And they may have multiple 56 fields with, from different providers.

119
00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:45.928
The provider neutral guidelines also lists.

120
00:13:49.139 --> 00:13:55.408
A whole bunch of different kinds of information that should not be included and provider neutral records.

121
00:13:55.408 --> 00:13:58.979
Very little provider specific information.

122
00:13:58.979 --> 00:14:04.438
Is included in the body of a provider neutral record.

123
00:14:04.438 --> 00:14:10.259
There are a few things that can't be included though. 1 is provider specific identifiers.

124
00:14:10.259 --> 00:14:13.408
Another exception is for title variance.

125
00:14:13.408 --> 00:14:21.418
On different providers websites, if a provider uses a different title on their website, it is helpful to have a 246.

126
00:14:21.418 --> 00:14:29.099
With the introductory note available from some vendors with titles such and such if you're basing or description.

127
00:14:29.099 --> 00:14:32.489
On a version access for particular vendors.

128
00:14:32.489 --> 00:14:36.028
Website that should be mentioned in the 5 and 8 field.

129
00:14:36.028 --> 00:14:42.298
Provider names also appear in a 56 3.

130
00:14:43.889 --> 00:14:50.668
And now for the much longer list of places, where you should not put provider specific information.

131
00:14:50.668 --> 00:14:59.129
This includes many of the fields for libraries may locally choose to add information about specific providers.

132
00:14:59.129 --> 00:15:04.168
If you want to provide access in the body of the record information.

133
00:15:04.168 --> 00:15:08.068
About individual databases, packages, or aggregators.

134
00:15:08.068 --> 00:15:14.068
You should do it only in your local record and not in a shared geographic utility.

135
00:15:23.938 --> 00:15:28.139
And there are many other kinds of information that you may wish to include.

136
00:15:28.139 --> 00:15:36.869
And a local record, which are forbidden and provider neutral records, these include things like access restrictions and system requirements.

137
00:15:36.869 --> 00:15:41.519
We also should not use the 533 field to describe a reproduction.

138
00:15:41.519 --> 00:15:47.219
All right, so moving on from provider neutral records.

139
00:15:47.219 --> 00:16:01.259
Let's talk about content type. There are 6 content types and that may be applicable of streaming medium. You're most likely to encounter these 1st, 3 performed music, spoken word and 2 dimensional moving image.

140
00:16:01.259 --> 00:16:08.249
But you should be aware of the other choices, and 1 special case that you should be aware of.

141
00:16:08.249 --> 00:16:14.458
Is that the all extra mean? Media best practices recommend that for streaming videos containing.

142
00:16:14.458 --> 00:16:21.058
Performance isn't musical works you should provide an additional content types for performed music.

143
00:16:21.293 --> 00:16:36.264
If you think the streaming video is likely to be sought as a musical work so this would be things like Opera performances or concert films. I tend to do this when it's a video that you can imagine someone just listening to the music with their eyes closed.

144
00:16:37.078 --> 00:16:41.308
And they also suggest that you could potentially add an additional content.

145
00:16:41.308 --> 00:16:44.729
Type of spoken word in some situations.

146
00:16:44.729 --> 00:16:50.759
But it's less obvious to me when this would actually be useful.

147
00:16:50.759 --> 00:16:56.759
Related to content type.

148
00:16:56.759 --> 00:17:00.928
When choosing a type of Mark record for online resources.

149
00:17:00.928 --> 00:17:04.409
You should base your decision on the content of the resource.

150
00:17:04.409 --> 00:17:12.898
At the fact that it is online, so for streaming media don't want to use g for streaming video.

151
00:17:12.898 --> 00:17:19.348
And I or j1st streaming audio.

152
00:17:20.878 --> 00:17:25.588
And you should always code the form fixed field as oh. For online.

153
00:17:25.588 --> 00:17:30.689
And code the type of visual material, fixed field, our team at.

154
00:17:30.689 --> 00:17:37.469
As B, for video, I have occasionally seen this coded as am promotion picture for streaming video.

155
00:17:37.469 --> 00:17:42.538
That was originally released and film, but I think this is incorrect in this field.

156
00:17:42.538 --> 00:17:45.538
She'd be coded for the resource that you're describing.

157
00:17:45.538 --> 00:17:49.528
Just, as you wouldn't code it, digitize my perform as micro form.

158
00:17:50.878 --> 00:17:59.038
The most common mistake I've seen when choosing a record type for streaming media occurs with databases and websites.

159
00:17:59.038 --> 00:18:02.038
Which are also continuing resources.

160
00:18:02.038 --> 00:18:06.868
Sometimes people choose a continuing resources work for them with type a of text.

161
00:18:06.868 --> 00:18:10.919
However, if the database consists of streaming medium.

162
00:18:10.919 --> 00:18:14.219
You should choose the appropriate record type for the content.

163
00:18:14.219 --> 00:18:17.848
And then code the graphic level in the overweight.

164
00:18:17.848 --> 00:18:22.138
Fixed beyond for the continuing resource aspect.

165
00:18:22.138 --> 00:18:26.788
For databases and websites generally I for integrating resource.

166
00:18:26.788 --> 00:18:33.148
And then add as 0, 0, 6 field to bring out the continuing resource aspects.

167
00:18:33.148 --> 00:18:40.108
You may also occasionally see some very old streaming media records coded as to.

168
00:18:40.108 --> 00:18:43.919
Computer file or form.

169
00:18:43.919 --> 00:18:47.519
But that is obsolete practice.

170
00:18:47.519 --> 00:18:57.298
Since you've coded the main record type for the content type, you'll also want to add.

171
00:18:57.298 --> 00:19:03.118
There was 0, 6 people to bring out the electronic or digital aspect of the resource.

172
00:19:03.118 --> 00:19:08.788
There aren't very many fields to code and the computer file. 6.

173
00:19:08.788 --> 00:19:13.019
Other than type form. Oh.

174
00:19:13.019 --> 00:19:16.528
And file type.

175
00:19:16.528 --> 00:19:22.169
At least for most resources for streaming video, the file type should be for representational.

176
00:19:22.169 --> 00:19:26.519
And for streaming audio H, for sounds.

177
00:19:26.519 --> 00:19:33.358
Media and carrier type are straightforward, use computer and online. We.

178
00:19:33.358 --> 00:19:40.828
So you want to remember that media carrier about the carrier in the remediation devices not about the content.

179
00:19:40.828 --> 00:19:46.558
For example, these are 3 media types that could potentially apply to moving images.

180
00:19:46.558 --> 00:19:56.068
Projected is, for things are actually on a film real video is for things that are designed for useful to play that playback device. It's like a D. V. D. player.

181
00:19:56.068 --> 00:20:00.568
Computer is for electronic files designed for use with the computer.

182
00:20:00.568 --> 00:20:04.919
And it's the only place where remote access is mentioned.

183
00:20:04.919 --> 00:20:15.719
So, you sometimes see people use audio or video in addition to computer as immediate type for streaming media media. But this is not what the, all our best practices recommend.

184
00:20:15.719 --> 00:20:19.348
And I do not think it is applicable since there isn't.

185
00:20:19.348 --> 00:20:25.348
A dedicated ID or video playback device involved.

186
00:20:25.348 --> 00:20:32.578
rba list number of digital characteristics at 3.19.

187
00:20:32.578 --> 00:20:43.979
The 1st, 1 is digital file type. This doesn't really add much new information to your record. But the ones that are applicable for streaming media are video file and audio file.

188
00:20:43.979 --> 00:20:49.648
And this particular already, a vocabulary has its own.

189
00:20:49.648 --> 00:20:53.999
Code to go in the marks some field to.

190
00:20:56.939 --> 00:21:03.328
Then next digital characteristic that I'm going to talk about is encoding format.

191
00:21:03.328 --> 00:21:11.368
Which is a schema standard, et cetera, used to encode the digital content of the manifestation. And when was 1st released.

192
00:21:11.368 --> 00:21:14.699
It provided a controlled vocabulary for this element.

193
00:21:14.699 --> 00:21:17.729
Which included terms, like, the ones listed here.

194
00:21:17.729 --> 00:21:20.939
However, the rba steering committee, or.

195
00:21:20.939 --> 00:21:25.378
Decided that it was unrealistic to maintain a list of encoding formats.

196
00:21:25.378 --> 00:21:28.979
And there currently is no already vocabulary for this element.

197
00:21:28.979 --> 00:21:34.949
And this is also an example of an element that is not used with provider neutral records.

198
00:21:34.949 --> 00:21:43.409
So an MP 3 audio file, and a way of audio file of equivalent manifestation should be cataloged on the same provider neutral record.

199
00:21:43.409 --> 00:21:47.848
Just like a PDF or an HTML version of an E book.

200
00:21:47.848 --> 00:21:58.858
File size and encoded bit right? Our 2 more digital characteristics that are not used with provider neutral records.

201
00:21:58.858 --> 00:22:06.989
And equipment, or system requirement is again, another note that you could use.

202
00:22:06.989 --> 00:22:13.108
And you may see this, especially in vendor records, but it's not used with provider neutral records.

203
00:22:14.159 --> 00:22:17.669
A sound characteristics.

204
00:22:17.669 --> 00:22:23.909
If the streaming media has sound, you can put digital under type of recording.

205
00:22:23.909 --> 00:22:29.098
Um, there was some recent discussion about this.

206
00:22:29.098 --> 00:22:34.828
And 1 of and the configuration of playback channels.

207
00:22:34.828 --> 00:22:40.138
So, olack, I can't think of what they're called, that unified best practices task force.

208
00:22:40.138 --> 00:22:45.479
Is planning to clarify that they don't think the configuration of playback channels.

209
00:22:45.479 --> 00:22:51.388
Belongs in a provider mutual record, but that is another option.

210
00:22:51.388 --> 00:22:55.138
If you're not doing provider, mutual cataloging.

211
00:22:55.138 --> 00:23:03.388
So, is video characteristics don't apply to streaming video video format is only for analog carriers.

212
00:23:03.388 --> 00:23:11.608
And broadcast standard is really mostly only relevant when something's being displayed on or broadcast to a television.

213
00:23:11.608 --> 00:23:20.729
In some way that potentially involves an analog signal, and it doesn't apply to video displayed on a computer monitor or other device.

214
00:23:20.729 --> 00:23:26.128
Which it can sort of compensate for the difference in frame rate between different.

215
00:23:26.128 --> 00:23:29.489
Broadcast standards.

216
00:23:33.419 --> 00:23:42.358
For extent, rba tells you to use the phrase 1 online, we source the examples and the provider neutral guideline and guidelines.

217
00:23:42.358 --> 00:23:54.808
If the file type in parentheses after that, I'm not really sure saying 2 video files is provider neutral. So different providers could split the files differently but that is 1 of their examples.

218
00:23:54.808 --> 00:24:02.398
You should also get the duration if known and if we had to accept, you can give information about things like column and sound.

219
00:24:02.398 --> 00:24:05.939
Just as you would for a tangible manifestation.

220
00:24:05.939 --> 00:24:11.038
Some of that information can also go in the market. We 40 field.

221
00:24:11.038 --> 00:24:16.769
There is a policy statement for this, which gives odd examples like video disk and parentheses.

222
00:24:16.769 --> 00:24:22.318
But I'm not sure when would ever actually do this.

223
00:24:22.318 --> 00:24:28.528
You won't want to make a couple of 0 0, 7 fields when cataloging streaming media.

224
00:24:28.528 --> 00:24:34.229
For a provider neutral record, only the 1st, 2 positions computer file.

225
00:24:34.229 --> 00:24:40.979
And remote access are required, you should also make formats specific 0, 0, 7 fields.

226
00:24:40.979 --> 00:24:44.729
Or sample recordings your video recordings as applicable.

227
00:24:44.729 --> 00:24:48.088
And most of the values for these are boilerplate.

228
00:24:48.088 --> 00:24:51.179
Are not coded for provider neutral records.

229
00:24:51.179 --> 00:24:59.608
But there are a few like color versus black and white that you should pay attention to. And I've sort of highlighted and color the ones.

230
00:24:59.608 --> 00:25:07.409
That are either not used or that you should pay attention to and I'm not going to talk about aspect ratio.

231
00:25:07.409 --> 00:25:13.769
Except to point out, that there was a discussion on the OLAP list a while ago about how to describe vertical videos.

232
00:25:13.769 --> 00:25:19.949
Nothing was really resolved and these are currently not distinguished from full screen videos in rba.

233
00:25:19.949 --> 00:25:23.969
But perhaps there should be a new term added to the vocabulary.

234
00:25:23.969 --> 00:25:29.009
And it's a side note, I'll mention there are 2 new fields related to aspect ratio.

235
00:25:29.009 --> 00:25:36.239
Coming to the mark, 3, 4 x fields, or you can put the rba elements aspect ratio value.

236
00:25:36.239 --> 00:25:39.479
And aspect ratio designator.

237
00:25:49.949 --> 00:26:01.499
So, moving on to talk more about how the manifestation describes itself, rather than the carrier, there are a couple of points to keep in mind about titles and preferred sources.

238
00:26:01.499 --> 00:26:10.108
1st of all, you should always give a source of title. No and I provide a neutral record. This will be combined with the 580 description based on note.

239
00:26:10.108 --> 00:26:14.038
It's also useful to keep in mind that the best practices.

240
00:26:14.038 --> 00:26:20.729
Recommend that you could should consider the landing page that links to the streaming media. They be part of the resource itself.

241
00:26:20.729 --> 00:26:27.179
Or streaming video, the special wall for moving images as to prefer the title frames.

242
00:26:27.179 --> 00:26:33.689
The good news is that since we're all probably catalog United computers that are connected to the Internet.

243
00:26:33.689 --> 00:26:37.199
You don't have to have any extra equipment to do the title frames.

244
00:26:37.199 --> 00:26:43.828
The bad news is that some thumbs bury the title many minutes in, and it can be time consuming to find.

245
00:26:43.828 --> 00:26:49.648
And unfortunately, in my experience, it's much harder to effectively fast forward screaming video.

246
00:26:49.648 --> 00:26:52.888
And it is with a tangible.

247
00:26:52.888 --> 00:27:00.808
There are some alternative sources if the resources that have a title frame, the most practical, which.

248
00:27:00.808 --> 00:27:10.648
It's probably the associated web page streaming audio falls under the general rule at 2.2.2.4.

249
00:27:10.648 --> 00:27:14.608
Which instructions says to prefer textual content.

250
00:27:14.608 --> 00:27:18.449
Such as the title on the web page that links to the streaming audio.

251
00:27:18.449 --> 00:27:25.769
So, this is just an excerpt from the best practices, which stated what I was.

252
00:27:25.769 --> 00:27:30.868
Mentioning about the link.

253
00:27:30.868 --> 00:27:40.259
Website being part of the resource, sort of like the packaging on a tangible video.

254
00:27:44.578 --> 00:27:55.048
So, it tells you to always make a note about the resource when cataloging and online resource, and in the provider neutral model. This is combined.

255
00:27:55.048 --> 00:27:59.189
With the note on the source of title proper.

256
00:27:59.189 --> 00:28:07.979
And there is a 1st indicator of value of 0T that you can use it also point out that.

257
00:28:07.979 --> 00:28:11.969
Were used in the 588 for description based on.

258
00:28:13.019 --> 00:28:18.929
If you're based senior provider, neutral prescription on a tangible version of the resource.

259
00:28:18.929 --> 00:28:27.868
Rather than I'd be willing to resource on a particular providers website, you should state this inside the instead of using notes.

260
00:28:27.868 --> 00:28:34.019
About the source of title proper and data viewing since your information isn't actually coming from the resource.

261
00:28:34.019 --> 00:28:37.679
That the online record is describing.

262
00:28:37.679 --> 00:28:49.138
Yeah, that that 2nd example there with uses the 1st indicator.

263
00:28:49.138 --> 00:28:55.078
0T to indicate that that note is for description based on without spelling it out.

264
00:28:59.669 --> 00:29:04.679
And if you're based in or description at a tangible version of the resource.

265
00:29:04.679 --> 00:29:09.838
You should make a 7, 7, 6, the off site site in the tangible version.

266
00:29:09.838 --> 00:29:12.898
This is common for certain types of streaming audio.

267
00:29:12.898 --> 00:29:17.999
But rare for streaming video, because of the difficulty in matching manifestations.

268
00:29:17.999 --> 00:29:24.929
Streaming video providers, as I mentioned, rarely given up the information to unambiguously match tangible manifestation.

269
00:29:24.929 --> 00:29:32.038
Particularly in terms of dates, they also do not necessarily we produce all the content on the tangible version.

270
00:29:32.038 --> 00:29:43.769
Such a special features, or do they necessarily offer the same language inaccessibility options? And if you're using connection the macro to generate an E, version of a record.

271
00:29:43.769 --> 00:29:49.169
For a tangible resource will also create the 7, 7 6 for you.

272
00:29:50.818 --> 00:29:57.179
And as I mentioned previously, 1 of the few places.

273
00:29:57.179 --> 00:30:01.348
That you can put provider specific information or provide a neutral record.

274
00:30:01.348 --> 00:30:04.588
Isn't a 246 to account for variance.

275
00:30:04.588 --> 00:30:07.798
It may be on a particular providers web page.

276
00:30:07.798 --> 00:30:13.858
And as with all media cataloging, I would encourage you to be generous with title variance.

277
00:30:17.669 --> 00:30:26.308
So, while on the top of what is that you're describing, I'd like to talk to her to mention platelets.

278
00:30:26.308 --> 00:30:31.709
And these can be described using either. What calls a comprehensive description.

279
00:30:31.709 --> 00:30:40.858
Or what it calls an analytic description, or both. So on the left is a comprehensive description for the whole playlist and titles.

280
00:30:40.858 --> 00:30:44.729
Pioneers of African Americans, cinema short films.

281
00:30:44.729 --> 00:30:50.878
1915 to 19, 2001, the title of the list is the title proper.

282
00:30:50.878 --> 00:30:57.028
And the title of the individual films are, equips are given in a 5 or 5 contents.

283
00:30:57.028 --> 00:31:03.628
You are all points to the playlist as a whole right? If there isn't 1 for the whole play list to the 1st phone clip.

284
00:31:03.628 --> 00:31:08.308
On the right is an analytic description from 1 of the songs on the playlist.

285
00:31:08.308 --> 00:31:12.269
In this case, the title of the individual is the title proper.

286
00:31:12.269 --> 00:31:15.269
And the points to the individual thumb.

287
00:31:15.269 --> 00:31:21.358
I haven't included the title of the play list since it wouldn't be included in a provider neutral record.

288
00:31:24.538 --> 00:31:28.048
So this is a situation I come across occasionally.

289
00:31:28.048 --> 00:31:31.048
Where there are playlists where the title of the play list.

290
00:31:31.048 --> 00:31:39.088
And the title at the individual films are the same as, in this example, where the playlist includes 2 versions of the same film.

291
00:31:39.088 --> 00:31:44.338
1, with the original Japanese sound track and 1 with adept English soundtrack.

292
00:31:44.338 --> 00:31:51.118
Since the playlist also has the same title. The best thing to do is to be sure to include our supply where necessary.

293
00:31:51.118 --> 00:32:03.749
Some kind of addition statement in 250, this will help prevent unwanted merging and shared databases by. And since addition statements display on results list in many public catalogue.

294
00:32:03.749 --> 00:32:11.818
They may also help users, distinguish the records without having to click into the full records and examine them.

295
00:32:11.818 --> 00:32:18.989
At the olack best practices among many other helpful things.

296
00:32:18.989 --> 00:32:23.189
Includes this flowchart for deciding where to take the title from.

297
00:32:23.189 --> 00:32:28.439
And I reproduced here the part that is most relevant for streaming video.

298
00:32:31.439 --> 00:32:39.868
And here's the part that's most relevant for streaming audio.

299
00:32:39.868 --> 00:32:50.038
And the provider neutral guidelines specified that if you're cataloging it on production.

300
00:32:50.038 --> 00:32:59.969
Of a tangible manifestation the publication related information should be based on the original manifestation and it's built graphic record.

301
00:32:59.969 --> 00:33:09.808
And the provider.

302
00:33:09.808 --> 00:33:18.868
I mean, when talking about publication and distribution information, I'm going to focus on streaming video, because that's where it gets really storming.

303
00:33:18.868 --> 00:33:23.398
There are several reasons why publication statements for videos are hard.

304
00:33:23.398 --> 00:33:28.348
And a big 1 is that it's unclear what it means to be a publisher in the film and video industry.

305
00:33:28.348 --> 00:33:37.558
Where there is no entity called publisher so if you look at the Internet Movie database, they only talk about production companies and distributors.

306
00:33:37.558 --> 00:33:42.838
And Wikipedia has a category for publishing companies by medium.

307
00:33:42.838 --> 00:33:50.068
But this doesn't include video either, even though they have things like board games and C. D ROMs and so forth.

308
00:33:50.068 --> 00:33:55.858
Add an embargo moving image. Cataloging rules don't discuss.

309
00:33:55.858 --> 00:34:05.669
Discuss publishers either they're equivalent to the to publication areas, called distribution, release and broadcast.

310
00:34:05.669 --> 00:34:12.358
So, there are a lot of different types of corporate bodies that might be associated with the video.

311
00:34:12.358 --> 00:34:19.619
And they can perform potentially a variety of functions, including the helpfully bake. So, and so presents.

312
00:34:23.309 --> 00:34:31.409
How do we know which corporate body to consider the publisher and the, the definition of publishing.

313
00:34:31.409 --> 00:34:37.708
Does include releasing or issuing it for broad the definitions.

314
00:34:37.708 --> 00:34:41.518
Of distributor as 1 of those kind of circular.

315
00:34:41.518 --> 00:34:48.628
Definitions that uses self to define itself. The distributor distributes.

316
00:34:48.628 --> 00:35:01.259
So, the traditional functions of a publisher in, for other formats are divided up between different types of entities for videos.

317
00:35:01.259 --> 00:35:06.208
And so the production company, for example, acquires or develops content.

318
00:35:06.208 --> 00:35:10.978
Oversees the production process and has the final editorial veto.

319
00:35:10.978 --> 00:35:14.369
And the production company may provide financing.

320
00:35:14.369 --> 00:35:18.778
Or this may be done by a separate company.

321
00:35:18.778 --> 00:35:23.579
And that we're streaming video in most cases, there is then another entity.

322
00:35:23.579 --> 00:35:28.079
The video on demand distributor, which functions as a middle.

323
00:35:28.079 --> 00:35:32.668
Man between the rights holder and the various streaming platforms.

324
00:35:32.668 --> 00:35:37.228
And so video rights are often carved up.

325
00:35:37.228 --> 00:35:42.509
And exclusive to a certain region or format, and they're often time limited.

326
00:35:42.509 --> 00:35:47.009
So, you might get the streaming rights from North America or the.

327
00:35:47.009 --> 00:35:53.369
Db rights for Canada or something like that.

328
00:35:54.509 --> 00:36:04.798
And then finally you have the platforms or the streaming video services, like Netflix or canopy, which provides centralized, access, streaming video for many sources.

329
00:36:04.798 --> 00:36:14.849
So, for the provider neutral record model to work, you have to be able to identify these equivalent manifestations.

330
00:36:14.849 --> 00:36:20.398
So, for streaming video, you 1st want to make sure that you have the same expression.

331
00:36:20.398 --> 00:36:24.719
So, for example, you would want to check that 2 videos, have the same duration.

332
00:36:24.719 --> 00:36:31.438
Language and accessibility options to identify 2 equivalent manifestations.

333
00:36:31.438 --> 00:36:35.009
Would presumably want to compare the publication information.

334
00:36:35.009 --> 00:36:40.199
But 1st, we have to decide what is the publication information that we want to compare.

335
00:36:40.199 --> 00:36:44.248
And then, ideally, we have to record it in the record record.

336
00:36:44.248 --> 00:36:56.278
In some way, so that any catalog are describing it. An equivalent manifestation would come up with the same publication statement. This is mostly straightforward with the books, but not so obvious for video.

337
00:37:05.789 --> 00:37:08.969
So.

338
00:37:08.969 --> 00:37:15.028
And I forget David or Nathan, or who is running the polls. But at this point.

339
00:37:16.974 --> 00:37:30.384
It's me yeah, it's okay. No worries. I have the 1st pull ready to go. Do you want me to initiate it? Yeah, this is this. Hopefully it should go with this question.

340
00:37:33.353 --> 00:37:35.483
So, let everyone see the pull.

341
00:37:45.809 --> 00:37:49.829
Can I get a confirmation if folks can see.

342
00:37:49.829 --> 00:37:54.778
Yeah, they're showing up Haley. All right perfect. Perfect, thank you.

343
00:38:01.643 --> 00:38:15.954
I think it's ended though we'll have a chance to answer that. Well, we can do is we can extend the time of the next call. I have it loaded for 15 seconds. I could do a minute.

344
00:38:16.164 --> 00:38:27.864
That's what you prefer or 30 seconds. Whatever you want. We can modify it, but I'm going to show the poll results for the folks that did that. Didn't submit an answer.

345
00:38:30.090 --> 00:38:36.719
All right, well, and I have to say that, yeah, maybe we should do 30 seconds just to get people.

346
00:38:36.719 --> 00:38:46.469
I just think sure sure. But then, I guess I could have read that question before we show the poll too. That might have.

347
00:38:46.469 --> 00:38:49.829
But we did get some answers, it looks like.

348
00:38:49.829 --> 00:38:56.010
And I think, you know, I don't have a firm answer to this either.

349
00:38:56.010 --> 00:38:59.159
I think we can pretty much rule out the.

350
00:38:59.159 --> 00:39:03.300
Financing company and I think the right folder.

351
00:39:03.300 --> 00:39:11.849
Doesn't really make a lot of sense as the publisher and either of those are necessarily very easy to identify. So.

352
00:39:11.849 --> 00:39:18.179
In theory, you shouldn't use the video on demand service provider, a neutral cataloging.

353
00:39:18.179 --> 00:39:24.329
However, not all platforms provide the name of the intermediary distributor.

354
00:39:24.329 --> 00:39:31.500
And then the name of the production company may not sufficiently distinguishes specific manifestation.

355
00:39:31.500 --> 00:39:37.050
For example, a video might have been edited differently for different geographical markets.

356
00:39:37.050 --> 00:39:40.860
And what I want to do.

357
00:39:40.860 --> 00:39:46.469
Maybe is go back.

358
00:39:49.405 --> 00:40:02.784
Another are you trying to your site wide? Like, do you have okay here? I see where it is. Okay.

359
00:40:02.784 --> 00:40:08.844
I got the you're going to share your screen. Oh, okay. You see this other slide.

360
00:40:09.150 --> 00:40:15.030
So this was an example here, if you look at this 8th grade is available from 3 different.

361
00:40:15.030 --> 00:40:24.420
Platforms and the top left, do you have canopy and they give their their supplier, which is like the distributor a 24.

362
00:40:24.420 --> 00:40:28.500
And then the bottom 1 is from slank and it's.

363
00:40:28.500 --> 00:40:34.949
I think from the provider neutral standard, it's an equivalent, you know, these are both English.

364
00:40:34.949 --> 00:40:42.960
With English captioning and no other language options and I think they're the same duration.

365
00:40:42.960 --> 00:40:47.880
At the Web site doesn't give you any indication of who the distributor is.

366
00:40:47.880 --> 00:40:51.840
And then this 1, kind of in the middle Orbitz in white.

367
00:40:51.840 --> 00:40:57.269
Is from criterion pictures, which is a Canadian platform.

368
00:40:57.269 --> 00:41:04.230
And so they have the same film, although they say it's 94 minutes instead of maybe 3 minutes.

369
00:41:04.230 --> 00:41:10.829
And they have a different distributor and so the information that you get kind of berries.

370
00:41:10.829 --> 00:41:16.260
And it just can be really difficult to tell whether.

371
00:41:16.260 --> 00:41:22.440
You are dealing with an equivalent manifestation or not especially when.

372
00:41:22.440 --> 00:41:25.469
Can't actually see the other manifestations.

373
00:41:25.469 --> 00:41:30.719
From the publishers or platforms that your libraries not subscribed to.

374
00:41:30.719 --> 00:41:34.170
Let me see if I can find my.

375
00:41:34.170 --> 00:41:37.829
Where I was before. Okay.

376
00:41:37.829 --> 00:41:41.579
Um.

377
00:41:41.579 --> 00:41:48.239
Okay.

378
00:41:48.239 --> 00:41:54.119
So, I'm sorry that I don't have Super.

379
00:41:54.119 --> 00:41:57.269
Right from answers for everything.

380
00:42:02.010 --> 00:42:05.760
And let's see, I think I'm going to.

381
00:42:05.760 --> 00:42:12.059
These 2 there is some information in the best practice.

382
00:42:12.059 --> 00:42:16.889
Guidelines on online, we productions and on.

383
00:42:16.889 --> 00:42:21.449
We're in digital for what to do with publication information.

384
00:42:21.449 --> 00:42:29.940
But it's still, you know, I find it really difficult to deal with what I'm actually dealing with real situations.

385
00:42:29.940 --> 00:42:33.510
So, my best recommendations.

386
00:42:33.510 --> 00:42:48.000
Or my best thoughts in this area are it's important to identify that the expression that your cataloguing matches, we definitely should not have different expressions on the same provider neutral record.

387
00:42:48.000 --> 00:42:53.400
In our particular look at the duration, the language options, the accessibility options.

388
00:42:53.400 --> 00:43:03.000
And the X rays, sometimes see, people have derived streaming records from DVD records, and they've left in the and.

389
00:43:03.000 --> 00:43:06.599
Things which are not actually in the streaming version.

390
00:43:06.599 --> 00:43:15.030
But that you probably, if you're matching match really loosely on publisher, a date of publication.

391
00:43:23.335 --> 00:43:23.875
Okay,

392
00:43:23.875 --> 00:43:26.815
and I expect this 1 in here locally,

393
00:43:26.815 --> 00:43:28.255
we produced videos,

394
00:43:28.585 --> 00:43:38.994
so this is where you might have gotten permission from the right folder to rip a DVD and stream it locally.

395
00:43:39.804 --> 00:43:51.264
And I get asked about this not infrequently. So, here, I would recommend looking at the section on local recordings and chapter 3 of us CLC formats.

396
00:43:51.599 --> 00:44:02.639
And this is 1 of those rare cases with streaming video, where you actually can pretty clearly identity, you can't clearly identify a specific manifestation.

397
00:44:04.590 --> 00:44:11.400
Um, like, I'm missing some slides in here.

398
00:44:12.989 --> 00:44:16.710
Oh, okay. This is the 1. I skipped.

399
00:44:16.710 --> 00:44:23.369
When I was talking about publication, I did have another poll question here, Haley, which is.

400
00:44:23.369 --> 00:44:31.590
Had to do with what do you think should be the data publication and our provider neutral world for a streaming video.

401
00:44:33.085 --> 00:44:45.835
Now, yeah. Okay. Yeah, I got a little out of order there. No worries. You're good. Toll is been an issue opened it for 30 seconds.

402
00:44:55.409 --> 00:44:58.800
Okay.

403
00:45:04.469 --> 00:45:13.860
The full end to very quickly. I wasn't able to to complete it.

404
00:45:15.300 --> 00:45:22.889
I'm going to release the results, but how I'm going to open it for.

405
00:45:22.889 --> 00:45:33.775
1 minute, and then I could close it when I see most of the attendees have filled it out. Does that work for everyone? Let's try that on the next 1. thanks, Haley.

406
00:45:34.585 --> 00:45:41.304
Well, actually, I would be kind of interested in people's input on this 1, because I don't actually have any answer for it. So.

407
00:45:41.849 --> 00:45:54.445
Maybe if we could do that 1 again, Haley. So, do you want me to redo this? Pull? Yeah, maybe. Okay me. 3rd.

408
00:46:13.530 --> 00:46:21.239
Okay, I release the pool and it's going to stay open for a minute to give people enough time.

409
00:46:49.704 --> 00:46:53.275
Now, that may be too much time that I guess it's kind of hard to get.

410
00:46:54.114 --> 00:47:06.625
These things, right? No worries. All right. So what do people end up thinking about this question?

411
00:47:24.204 --> 00:47:24.804
Alright.

412
00:47:25.889 --> 00:47:34.679
Get that, and it seems like there's a slight majority for the date. That'd be equivalent tangible manifestation.

413
00:47:34.679 --> 00:47:45.480
Which I, you know, I think would be fine if there actually was some way to figure out what the equivalent tangible manifestation really is sort of reliably.

414
00:47:45.480 --> 00:47:49.409
And that the challenge I see with that is that.

415
00:47:49.409 --> 00:47:55.769
You know, when you have the book, you can look at the PDF of the book, and it's got that copyright date or.

416
00:47:55.769 --> 00:48:03.090
Publication date, but you just don't really have that, and you can go around and look for a record, but it kind of depends.

417
00:48:03.090 --> 00:48:07.920
And then, do you go back to the DHS record? You go back.

418
00:48:07.920 --> 00:48:13.530
And it did, they necessarily we produce the.

419
00:48:13.530 --> 00:48:22.739
Or produce the streaming video from the DVD version maybe they both are produced from some original source file.

420
00:48:22.739 --> 00:48:27.719
And the streaming version didn't really go through the DBD version.

421
00:48:27.719 --> 00:48:33.510
Anyway, I don't know on my own personal inclination.

422
00:48:33.510 --> 00:48:36.989
Is to think that it might be.

423
00:48:36.989 --> 00:48:42.300
Better to use the date of the original manifestation.

424
00:48:42.300 --> 00:48:47.550
Mostly because it's 1 way to arrive at the same value.

425
00:48:47.550 --> 00:48:51.030
Multiple people would hopefully arrive at the same value.

426
00:48:51.030 --> 00:48:54.599
And it does have the added advantage of aligning better with.

427
00:48:54.599 --> 00:49:00.210
I think what I think most users expectations are, when searching for videos.

428
00:49:00.210 --> 00:49:08.909
You just see these last 2 kinds of dates on a lot of vendor records that they definitely don't support the goals of the.

429
00:49:08.909 --> 00:49:12.150
Provide a neutral standard.

430
00:49:12.150 --> 00:49:20.550
And but some vendors do seem to update their data publication in their mark records when they revise their records.

431
00:49:20.550 --> 00:49:24.150
Okay, and.

432
00:49:24.150 --> 00:49:27.780
That that.

433
00:49:31.380 --> 00:49:34.559
Okay, identifiers.

434
00:49:34.559 --> 00:49:40.500
So, although most streaming media do not have universal.

435
00:49:40.500 --> 00:49:44.429
They often do you have some sort of publisher associated number?

436
00:49:44.429 --> 00:49:55.980
And it's common to see publisher numbers from the tangible version in records for streaming music go to our though, to a not have a Z for invalid identifiers.

437
00:49:55.980 --> 00:50:00.269
Identifiers and other formats, you'd have to use a.

438
00:50:00.269 --> 00:50:09.329
Vendor records, particularly for streaming video often, include identifiers, assigned by the streaming video platform in 2 8.

439
00:50:09.329 --> 00:50:13.320
And this could be useful for matching at the provider neutral.

440
00:50:13.320 --> 00:50:18.840
As the provider neutral model allows these identifiers and records from monographs.

441
00:50:18.840 --> 00:50:24.690
And as you can see from the examples, spenders code these in a variety of different ways.

442
00:50:24.690 --> 00:50:30.989
So, last night in this section, I'd like to talk a little bit about accessibility.

443
00:50:30.989 --> 00:50:37.380
Even though it isn't an issue that you need to streaming media, because it's important and some aspects of it.

444
00:50:37.380 --> 00:50:45.989
Are often misunderstood, and the current definition of accessibility content says that it provides alternative sensory modes.

445
00:50:45.989 --> 00:50:49.530
To perceive the primary content of an expression.

446
00:50:49.530 --> 00:50:57.269
So, I think was streaming audio. I'm not aware of any accessibility technologies commonly use that as a transcripts.

447
00:50:57.269 --> 00:51:00.750
But there are a variety that are very important for streaming video.

448
00:51:00.750 --> 00:51:05.340
And the most frequent accessibility feature streaming video is captioning.

449
00:51:05.340 --> 00:51:08.429
Art again includes the statement does not include.

450
00:51:08.429 --> 00:51:12.809
Subtitles in a language different from this book and content.

451
00:51:12.809 --> 00:51:15.840
This is a little bit misleading subtitles.

452
00:51:15.840 --> 00:51:20.760
In a language different from the spoken content can be part of accessibility content.

453
00:51:20.760 --> 00:51:25.469
Even if they cannot constitute accessibility content by themselves.

454
00:51:25.469 --> 00:51:30.269
So, what is it that makes captions or subtitles sufficient for accessibility?

455
00:51:30.269 --> 00:51:38.280
For captions to be effective, they should include the complete spoken content of the video, but that's not necessarily enough. They also need to include.

456
00:51:38.280 --> 00:51:43.800
All the information necessary for understanding by someone who cannot hear the sound track.

457
00:51:43.800 --> 00:51:47.760
Captions, therefore may include some nonsmoking information.

458
00:51:47.760 --> 00:51:50.789
Such as indications of sound effects in music.

459
00:51:50.789 --> 00:51:54.119
Speaker identification when it isn't clear who's speaking.

460
00:51:54.119 --> 00:51:57.150
And other contextual information.

461
00:51:57.150 --> 00:52:08.610
For English speakers, the captions are subtitles to be in English, regardless of the spoken language. So what does subtitles commonly lack that captions for accessibility include?

462
00:52:08.610 --> 00:52:12.030
In addition to the contextual information that I just mentioned.

463
00:52:12.030 --> 00:52:20.610
Subtitles for foreign language films often do not include sequences that are spoken the language at the target audience for the subtitles.

464
00:52:20.610 --> 00:52:24.449
So, for example, if there's a scene in the Spanish language film.

465
00:52:24.449 --> 00:52:31.260
Where the actors are speaking English, that's usually not subtitle for an English speaking audience.

466
00:52:34.440 --> 00:52:42.150
So, how do you know if something is captioned unfortunately really can't know without watching the whole video.

467
00:52:42.150 --> 00:52:48.989
That forced to have captions and keep an eye out for any contextual information that might be missing.

468
00:52:48.989 --> 00:52:52.320
Many streaming videos have a little CC button.

469
00:52:52.320 --> 00:53:04.019
But this doesn't guarantee actual captions that are satisfaction for accessible, satisfactory for accessibility. Sometimes they could be just subtitles for the foreign language parts.

470
00:53:04.019 --> 00:53:09.510
At some videos, and I have even seen the sent vendor websites, have auto generated captions.

471
00:53:09.510 --> 00:53:13.949
Which can be wildly and accurate, and probably should be marked as captions.

472
00:53:13.949 --> 00:53:26.159
In library records, as a matter of practicality, pretty much have to rely on information supplied by the video provider and unfortunately many of them don't explicitly state.

473
00:53:26.159 --> 00:53:31.710
Whether or not a video is captioned and the only indication may be the presence of the CC buttons.

474
00:53:31.710 --> 00:53:36.659
So this means you can't be absolutely sure. For example, that a non English language.

475
00:53:36.659 --> 00:53:42.960
Is actually captioned or if the CC button is just producing, what are essentially optional subtitles.

476
00:53:42.960 --> 00:53:53.670
However, in the absence of other information, all you can do is record how the provider presents inaccessibility content for the video.

477
00:53:53.670 --> 00:54:03.179
Another thing to watch out for, is that some vendors will caption videos on demand. So, video that may not have started out with captions.

478
00:54:03.179 --> 00:54:08.639
May have them added later and this is a problematic area for provider mutual records.

479
00:54:08.639 --> 00:54:13.380
Because accessibility content is expression, level information and.

480
00:54:13.380 --> 00:54:18.510
Videos with, and without captions cannot be considered civil at manifestations.

481
00:54:18.510 --> 00:54:23.639
I also pick accessibility is the of their provider mutual record.

482
00:54:23.639 --> 00:54:27.960
Note that you should record the language at the captions in the more specific.

483
00:54:27.960 --> 00:54:31.679
For 1, rather than it's J.

484
00:54:31.679 --> 00:54:36.360
And add a 655 for video recordings for the hearing impaired.

485
00:54:36.360 --> 00:54:40.679
Another excessive money feature that.

486
00:54:40.679 --> 00:54:46.199
Vendors provide our transcripts and in addition to being useful for accessibility.

487
00:54:46.199 --> 00:54:55.349
These can be very useful for catalog. Sometimes as, in this example, you can easily verify that the captions include contextual information.

488
00:54:55.349 --> 00:54:59.789
They may also include transcribe the information from the title frames.

489
00:54:59.789 --> 00:55:05.039
Which can make a catalog or life easier. It can be very time consuming to.

490
00:55:05.039 --> 00:55:09.539
Try to fast forward to find information in the title frames.

491
00:55:09.539 --> 00:55:17.969
Streaming video notice also that there was a new in for 1 for recording the language.

492
00:55:17.969 --> 00:55:22.019
The company transcripts for audio, visual materials.

493
00:55:22.019 --> 00:55:28.019
And there are also 2 newish fields 345 or 532.

494
00:55:28.019 --> 00:55:31.650
For recording accessibility information.

495
00:55:35.489 --> 00:55:40.949
Although they do not seem to be widely used yet.

496
00:55:40.949 --> 00:55:44.429
As far as I know there are no best practices for these fields.

497
00:55:45.659 --> 00:55:49.829
At least not yet 341 is for structured content.

498
00:55:49.829 --> 00:55:52.920
Ideally, from my control vocabulary.

499
00:55:52.920 --> 00:55:55.949
And 3 and 41 support a little.

500
00:55:55.949 --> 00:56:04.019
Counterintuitive it 1st, and sub field a record the sensory mode required to access the content of the resource.

501
00:56:04.019 --> 00:56:07.079
Without using assisted features.

502
00:56:07.079 --> 00:56:11.489
So the captions or transcript in these examples.

503
00:56:11.489 --> 00:56:15.239
Are substituting for that.

504
00:56:15.239 --> 00:56:18.300
Auditory content.

505
00:56:18.300 --> 00:56:22.769
At 532 is used for free text notes.

506
00:56:22.769 --> 00:56:28.469
And now, I guess we're at the point where.

507
00:56:28.469 --> 00:56:32.489
We can maybe take questions and have a break.

508
00:56:34.644 --> 00:56:49.614
Okay, if you have a question for Kelly, please click on the little raised hand icon, at the end of the list of attendees, and I will be looking for folks with their hand raised, I'll mention your name and then Haley will on mute you.

509
00:56:49.614 --> 00:56:51.235
So you can ask your question to Kelly.

510
00:56:52.860 --> 00:57:02.039
I think there also may be questions to that does always an option to.

511
00:57:03.355 --> 00:57:06.025
Just been numerous comments in chat.

512
00:57:06.864 --> 00:57:19.255
The only question that I noticed it took back because Kelly actually answered this because she was talking I am not seeing any raised hands.

513
00:57:19.739 --> 00:57:26.340
I want to make sure I'm doing this. Right? So, let's give it a few more seconds.

514
00:57:28.469 --> 00:57:42.204
Unless Haley, you know, some way to see when this happens. I miss. Yeah, I'm looking at as well and raised 10 so perhaps then we shall go to break or whatever you want. Kenny? Yeah, that sounds good.

515
00:57:42.204 --> 00:57:43.585
Let's take.

516
00:57:44.699 --> 00:57:57.565
About maybe 10 minutes here. Okay. It's 2 minutes to the hour. So let's say about 8 minutes after the hour. Yep, that sounds good. All right.

517
00:57:57.565 --> 00:58:02.934
Everybody about 10 minutes. Excellent.

518
01:07:53.125 --> 01:08:00.775
Welcome back everybody tell me a question popped up over break. So if you don't mind, you want to start with that. I can read it to you.

519
01:08:01.494 --> 01:08:15.414
Sure, Brian was asking about the 300 field beginning with 1 online resource and noted that sometimes he sees 1 streaming video file and parentheses afterwards is it okay to add 1 streaming video file?

520
01:08:15.414 --> 01:08:17.845
Or should it just be 1 video file in the parentheses?

521
01:08:19.229 --> 01:08:28.649
Well, if you're following the provider neutral file, you can't talk provider neutral model.

522
01:08:28.649 --> 01:08:33.210
Then you would not want to use streaming in there because.

523
01:08:33.210 --> 01:08:40.649
It wouldn't distinguish between the streaming and the downloadable video files in terms of put in a separate records.

524
01:08:40.649 --> 01:08:47.880
No, and I don't think that's the examples in, but already, of course, then tells you.

525
01:08:47.880 --> 01:08:55.920
That you can use another term and common use. So I guess if you were doing a provider specific record.

526
01:08:55.920 --> 01:09:04.109
You know, that that would be acceptable. It's probably not the 1st thing I would worry about correcting in a streaming video record.

527
01:09:04.109 --> 01:09:13.680
But at least if you're following the provider neutral model, and you're making a record, then I would not include the word screaming though.

528
01:09:13.680 --> 01:09:20.189
Thanks Kelly. I hope that answers your question, Brian it's not you can add a follow up.

529
01:09:20.189 --> 01:09:25.470
Thanks okay.

530
01:09:25.470 --> 01:09:30.000
And no other questions.

531
01:09:31.829 --> 01:09:37.829
All right, no, not at this point some people are commenting about, you know, what they do.

532
01:09:37.829 --> 01:09:42.930
In their own practices, but nobody had a question for say.

533
01:09:42.930 --> 01:09:46.109
Okay, well, I guess we can.

534
01:09:46.109 --> 01:09:51.960
Keep going then. Cool. Um, so.

535
01:09:51.960 --> 01:09:57.060
Now, we're moving on to territory where, I mean, on even less from footing.

536
01:09:57.060 --> 01:10:03.539
Continuing resources, so I'm not actually really going to talk about blogs.

537
01:10:03.539 --> 01:10:09.930
But I'm going to use them as a jumping off point to discuss some parallel formats feature and audio and video.

538
01:10:09.930 --> 01:10:15.840
So a live website published in the form of a series of discreet text entries are post.

539
01:10:15.840 --> 01:10:20.880
And a blog or video blog is a form of blog that uses video posts.

540
01:10:20.880 --> 01:10:28.920
Rather than textual posts, and podcasts are a similar format using audio files.

541
01:10:28.920 --> 01:10:38.970
And video podcasts also exists and from what I can tell there does not seem to be a hard and fast line between the definition of video blog.

542
01:10:38.970 --> 01:10:42.479
And video podcast.

543
01:10:42.479 --> 01:10:46.079
So your content carrier and type of record.

544
01:10:46.079 --> 01:10:55.350
Are determined in the same way, as for any streaming media, taking the example of a podcast. The Mark record type is eye for spoken recording.

545
01:10:55.350 --> 01:11:01.260
Form is oh, for online and you've got your 3, 3 X fields there.

546
01:11:01.260 --> 01:11:06.180
The new twist with podcasts and video blogs.

547
01:11:06.180 --> 01:11:11.460
Is that now? We have to deal with what rba calls motive issuance.

548
01:11:11.460 --> 01:11:15.000
Which has to deal with whether it manifestation is issued.

549
01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:18.029
In 1 or more parks, the way it's updated.

550
01:11:18.029 --> 01:11:23.100
And whether it's determination is predetermined or or not.

551
01:11:23.100 --> 01:11:31.050
Since blacks and podcasts have multiple poster episodes.

552
01:11:31.050 --> 01:11:35.550
We're no longer dealing with a more straightforward, simple part monograph.

553
01:11:35.550 --> 01:11:39.569
Already lists several other types of modes of issuants.

554
01:11:39.569 --> 01:11:51.300
Including multi part monograph, simple sorry cereal and integrating resource. So now we're ready for the next poll.

555
01:11:51.300 --> 01:11:54.390
Which is what do you think the motive issuance.

556
01:11:54.390 --> 01:12:02.489
Should be for a podcast, multipart, monograph cereal, or integrating resource.

557
01:12:37.739 --> 01:12:40.829
Okay, it looks like the pole ended.

558
01:12:53.579 --> 01:12:59.220
Okay, and then we have some split results.

559
01:12:59.220 --> 01:13:04.079
So, you know, I had a little bit of confusion about this myself.

560
01:13:04.079 --> 01:13:12.569
And I did ask on the PCCC list where there are people with more continuing resources expertise that I have.

561
01:13:12.569 --> 01:13:16.020
And the consensus seemed to be that most blogs.

562
01:13:16.020 --> 01:13:26.039
Logs and podcasts, she'd be considered Serials a motive issuance about manifestation issues in successive parks. Usually very numbering.

563
01:13:26.039 --> 01:13:29.430
It has no predetermined conclusion.

564
01:13:35.340 --> 01:13:42.239
So, I think the way to think about this, is that what you're describing is the series of posts for episodes.

565
01:13:42.239 --> 01:13:47.939
And not the web pages that surround them the individual posts, or episodes are discreet.

566
01:13:47.939 --> 01:13:53.939
And issues in succession, it may not have number. Right? But most of them show a date when they were posted.

567
01:13:53.939 --> 01:13:56.939
So, they have a chronological designation.

568
01:13:56.939 --> 01:14:01.710
The website that hosts the blog, or podcast is probably an integrating resource.

569
01:14:01.710 --> 01:14:12.029
But the poster episodes are issued seriously, you should also watch out for this idea of no predetermined conclusion, which, I think was mentioned in the chat also.

570
01:14:12.029 --> 01:14:18.869
And this is based on the issuer's intent. So, for example, a series of blog posts done for an academic class.

571
01:14:18.869 --> 01:14:22.170
Would be a multipe monograph and not a serial.

572
01:14:22.170 --> 01:14:25.770
If the intent is to end the posting and the class is over.

573
01:14:25.770 --> 01:14:40.470
And as I keep saying, the mark record type for digital resources is based on content. So for video blogs and podcasts, you would still have type.

574
01:14:40.470 --> 01:14:44.340
But with a** and the only the level fixed field.

575
01:14:44.340 --> 01:14:48.359
Add is 0. 0 6 to bring out.

576
01:14:51.539 --> 01:14:56.520
That continuing resource aspect.

577
01:15:02.430 --> 01:15:13.949
So, I'm not really going to talk about the new, but I would be remiss if I didn't say something briefly about a significant change that's coming.

578
01:15:13.949 --> 01:15:25.590
And will replace motive issuance. So diachronic works are a new thing, and already in the new, and are defined as works that are planned to be embodied over time.

579
01:15:25.590 --> 01:15:32.279
And this plan has several attributes and extension requirement.

580
01:15:32.279 --> 01:15:41.550
An extension mode and an extension termination and these values can be combined to describe what we currently call. Multipart monographs.

581
01:15:41.550 --> 01:15:45.239
Cereals and integrating resources.

582
01:15:48.180 --> 01:15:54.359
So, for resources that have been issued in more than 1 part.

583
01:15:54.359 --> 01:15:58.170
Before identified a preferred source for the title proper.

584
01:15:58.170 --> 01:16:11.489
You have to decide which of the parts to base your description on and for Serials. Are they instructs you to generally prefer the part with the lowest number or last date of issue?

585
01:16:11.489 --> 01:16:19.109
My team decided on the part on which to base your description, then you're back to lucky for a preferred source.

586
01:16:19.109 --> 01:16:22.710
And for streaming video, you should stop for for the title frames.

587
01:16:22.710 --> 01:16:28.229
Or streaming audio usually the best source is textual information on the associate web page.

588
01:16:28.229 --> 01:16:33.029
As with all information on the web, this information is potentially not static.

589
01:16:33.029 --> 01:16:37.199
But it is the most practical and sometimes the only option.

590
01:16:37.199 --> 01:16:42.600
So this is the screenshot, a screenshot of the 1st, episode of a podcast.

591
01:16:42.600 --> 01:16:47.880
And although the individual episode title is more prominent.

592
01:16:47.880 --> 01:16:52.050
To pick this part as the basis of your identification.

593
01:16:52.050 --> 01:16:59.489
And the podcast title can't be clearly identified and justice with any online resource.

594
01:16:59.489 --> 01:17:05.489
You want to make a note about where, and often when you got your information.

595
01:17:11.189 --> 01:17:15.810
Add in addition for Serials cataloging, you should note.

596
01:17:15.810 --> 01:17:20.159
Which part of the resource you're basing, or description on.

597
01:17:20.159 --> 01:17:24.869
And finally serial records have a 2nd 588.

598
01:17:24.869 --> 01:17:29.310
Well, you should note the most recent post or episode that you examined.

599
01:17:30.359 --> 01:17:38.100
Add, although rba itself requires at least 1 statement of responsibility.

600
01:17:38.100 --> 01:17:41.579
Policy statement says.

601
01:17:41.579 --> 01:17:45.750
That a statement of responsibility is not required for Serials.

602
01:17:45.750 --> 01:17:50.609
Traditional Serials are usually the product of organizations and individuals.

603
01:17:50.609 --> 01:17:55.289
So has an exception for Serials discouraging from recording.

604
01:17:55.289 --> 01:17:58.829
Personal statements of responsibility for editors.

605
01:17:58.829 --> 01:18:03.390
And all those, some blogs and podcasts are created by which, and organizations.

606
01:18:03.390 --> 01:18:12.300
Many are the work of individuals or a couple people so they don't fit neatly into this traditional model of cereals.

607
01:18:12.300 --> 01:18:17.489
There is also a special instruction in.

608
01:18:17.489 --> 01:18:21.029
For persons or families consider to be creators and to cereals.

609
01:18:21.029 --> 01:18:31.859
When I was preparing this section, I cataloged a couple of podcasts to work through the process for myself. And then I got some feedback on my records on the PCCC list.

610
01:18:31.859 --> 01:18:37.109
Although there are still a couple of things that I'm not entirely.

611
01:18:37.109 --> 01:18:48.630
Sure, I'm on from foot in and any errors are definitely mine. I will put the OCC numbers of these 2 records in Chad.

612
01:18:48.630 --> 01:18:51.840
So that people can look at them if they.

613
01:18:51.840 --> 01:18:57.329
Wish.

614
01:18:58.859 --> 01:19:04.470
Um.

615
01:19:04.470 --> 01:19:08.579
And it appears to be that for both of my examples.

616
01:19:08.579 --> 01:19:12.840
They should qualify for having a personal creator.

617
01:19:12.840 --> 01:19:18.239
But I did get stuck on what the relationship designator should be.

618
01:19:23.760 --> 01:19:30.479
For the personal creator of a video podcast or blog, I would use filmmaker.

619
01:19:30.479 --> 01:19:36.479
Which is listed in the section of appendix I, for relationship designators for creators.

620
01:19:36.479 --> 01:19:41.130
However, I'm not seeing anything similar that I could use for an audio podcast.

621
01:19:41.130 --> 01:19:44.399
Relationship that I currently.

622
01:19:44.399 --> 01:19:49.739
App host and interviewer expression are only linked to expressions.

623
01:19:49.739 --> 01:19:58.409
Unfortunately already doesn't recognize performers as creators. It works. So I ended up going with the general high level designation creator.

624
01:19:58.409 --> 01:20:04.710
But if anyone has other ideas, put please put them and chat or email me.

625
01:20:06.239 --> 01:20:13.050
Since blacks and podcasts are published in parks over time, they'll generally record a range of publication dates.

626
01:20:13.050 --> 01:20:16.890
Noted in Mark that did fit value for date ranges.

627
01:20:16.890 --> 01:20:20.550
For continuing resource records is see.

628
01:20:20.550 --> 01:20:30.659
If new poster episodes are still being added date, 2 should be 9, 9, 9, 9 for shells cataloging. You should only get the 1st and last date.

629
01:20:30.659 --> 01:20:34.829
And 264th, we have the relevant manifestations in hand.

630
01:20:34.829 --> 01:20:41.039
Which usually isn't a problem for blogs and podcasts.

631
01:20:41.039 --> 01:20:47.909
And especially for podcasts are often multiple sites where the resources available.

632
01:20:47.909 --> 01:20:56.010
From a provider neutral standpoint is probably best to base the description on the source version that this can be identified.

633
01:20:56.010 --> 01:20:59.729
In some cases the creator of the podcast maintains a website.

634
01:20:59.729 --> 01:21:05.970
Portion of our Web site for the podcast, and then syndicates the content to other podcast platforms.

635
01:21:05.970 --> 01:21:09.810
As in the 1st, 260, for example, here.

636
01:21:09.810 --> 01:21:20.250
There are also a number of companies that will host your podcast such as anchor the podcast shown in the bottom. Right? Screenshot is an example of this.

637
01:21:20.250 --> 01:21:24.210
The creator of the podcast uploads content to the anchor website.

638
01:21:24.210 --> 01:21:29.039
And then mix the content available to a variety of other sites.

639
01:21:29.039 --> 01:21:33.479
As you can see by the numerous icons above the episode title.

640
01:21:33.479 --> 01:21:38.310
In this case, I would base the description on the anchor website version.

641
01:21:38.310 --> 01:21:41.670
I ended up considering the podcasts to be self published.

642
01:21:41.670 --> 01:21:44.970
Bank or website provides a space to upload content.

643
01:21:44.970 --> 01:21:52.829
At tools to disseminated, but doesn't seem to do anything else. I think it's.

644
01:21:52.829 --> 01:21:57.090
And now, I guess to someone put in their blog on a hosted site, like.

645
01:21:57.090 --> 01:22:01.470
And from what I can tell, Elsie doesn't seem to treat blogger as a publisher.

646
01:22:01.470 --> 01:22:09.989
For extent, already tells you that when preparing a comprehensive description for a manifestation.

647
01:22:09.989 --> 01:22:16.500
It is not yet complete. You should record the term indicating that the type of unit without the number.

648
01:22:16.500 --> 01:22:21.600
However, once it's finished, you can add in the numbering.

649
01:22:21.600 --> 01:22:34.560
And there are a couple special fields and notes that are used for cereals. You should make a 362 feel given membrane of the 1st issue.

650
01:22:34.560 --> 01:22:40.350
And a 515 note can be used to describe any changes or regularities.

651
01:22:40.350 --> 01:22:45.000
If the post episodes aren't number just use the date the posting.

652
01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:58.170
Another attribute of continuing resources. Is there a frequency or lack thereof?

653
01:22:58.170 --> 01:23:06.239
Already provides a controlled vocabulary for recording frequency. If the podcast, her blog has a standard frequency.

654
01:23:06.239 --> 01:23:12.930
It can be recorded in that we tend field as well as in the associated. 6.

655
01:23:12.930 --> 01:23:17.609
As shown here, if new poster episode.

656
01:23:17.609 --> 01:23:29.130
Are known to be added irregularly, put irregular and 310 and code the associated fixed fields appropriately. If you don't know if the blogger podcast has a standard frequency or not.

657
01:23:29.130 --> 01:23:33.720
Omit 310 and put you for unknown in the relevant fixed fields.

658
01:23:33.720 --> 01:23:38.369
So, podcast particular may be available.

659
01:23:38.369 --> 01:23:41.729
Add multiple platforms with multiple.

660
01:23:41.729 --> 01:23:46.500
As many of these, as you wish may be put on a single provider neutral records.

661
01:23:46.500 --> 01:23:52.500
Ever it's okay to be selected and it's not necessary to go looking for additional URLs.

662
01:23:52.500 --> 01:23:56.130
There may also be cases where there are multiple potential places.

663
01:23:56.130 --> 01:24:05.220
And a single site to link to the consumer manual recommends choosing anywhere else that functions, like a table of contents. If there is 1.

664
01:24:08.579 --> 01:24:12.960
And in addition to, or instead of cataloging the whole podcast or blog.

665
01:24:12.960 --> 01:24:17.520
You may wish to catalogue some or all of the individual episodes or posts.

666
01:24:17.520 --> 01:24:27.180
In this case, you would catalog as a monograph and the title proper would normally be the episode or post title the title of the podcast or a blog as a whole.

667
01:24:27.180 --> 01:24:30.750
Could go in 7, 7, 3, host item entry.

668
01:24:30.750 --> 01:24:38.760
And that's the end of the section on blogs and podcasts and.

669
01:24:38.760 --> 01:24:43.079
I'll stop here in case. Anyone has any questions.

670
01:24:43.079 --> 01:24:47.850
About that, or the streaming media section in general.

671
01:24:47.850 --> 01:25:01.770
You can go ahead and click on the raise your right hand icon. There was a bit of chatter about relationship designators for these someone suggested podcaster and someone else host.

672
01:25:01.770 --> 01:25:15.420
Might be appropriate. I noticed that you did include host in 1 of your examples. If not both of them I did include host. The problem with host is that.

673
01:25:15.420 --> 01:25:26.819
And I don't actually agree with the modeling of the way already is mental model on this. But this is the way already is set up host.

674
01:25:26.819 --> 01:25:32.159
Is a relationship designator that is connected to expressions.

675
01:25:32.159 --> 01:25:37.140
So, it, it just put it in a 100 field as a.

676
01:25:37.140 --> 01:25:41.279
Unless it's in addition to some sort of relationship designator.

677
01:25:41.279 --> 01:25:44.399
That is, um.

678
01:25:44.935 --> 01:25:54.835
Creator title, and that's why I hate those definitions that point. It shouldn't happen.

679
01:25:54.835 --> 01:26:09.354
Logistically there's another chat question from Lynn for individual episodes. Why not use it to a 45 with a instead of episode in the 245 and podcast in the 773.

680
01:26:11.069 --> 01:26:17.579
So, you would do that if the individual post titles aren't distinctive.

681
01:26:17.579 --> 01:26:23.369
But the instructions and and.

682
01:26:23.369 --> 01:26:30.569
Remember this if, if you're cataloging a part of something and the part title is distinctive.

683
01:26:30.569 --> 01:26:35.430
Then the title of the thing is that part title.

684
01:26:35.430 --> 01:26:47.729
And not that sort of would not use the AP construction there. That sounds right to me, although it's not something I refer to a lot.

685
01:26:47.729 --> 01:26:51.149
Yeah, I don't have the the.

686
01:26:51.149 --> 01:26:57.180
At hand, right at the moment, since I'm not on our VPN.

687
01:26:57.180 --> 01:27:10.079
But I'm trying to get their minds hanging up so we may have to roll it back up. But that, that certainly sounds familiar to me as well. Kelly. Thank you. Yeah, I can follow up on that.

688
01:27:10.079 --> 01:27:14.250
I do not see any raised hands.

689
01:27:15.510 --> 01:27:24.899
Someone Mary Congo suggested bloggers and bloggers with a V. are searchable using those terms.

690
01:27:24.899 --> 01:27:33.720
And then Linda, that sounds right I just don't like that idea when I'm trying to keep things together for display.

691
01:27:33.720 --> 01:27:37.199
That.

692
01:27:37.199 --> 01:27:42.899
There are advantages and disadvantages to both ways and yeah.

693
01:27:42.899 --> 01:27:46.859
But it's true sometimes.

694
01:27:46.859 --> 01:27:53.460
R D, especially the relationship phrases and terminology can be very confining.

695
01:27:53.460 --> 01:28:00.390
That's all I'm saying. So, if you want to proceed, Colleen, I think that would be okay.

696
01:28:00.390 --> 01:28:04.529
All right, my will move on to the last section that here.

697
01:28:04.529 --> 01:28:11.970
Which is on tangible digital resources and I'm just going to talk about we.

698
01:28:11.970 --> 01:28:17.369
Probably representative types of digital tangible resources optical discs.

699
01:28:17.369 --> 01:28:21.659
Such a. C. D ROMs USP flash drives and player ways.

700
01:28:21.659 --> 01:28:26.130
So the 3 flavors have optical discs.

701
01:28:26.130 --> 01:28:40.739
That you are most likely to encounter our and blue Ray and 1st of all, I want to review the basic physical characteristics of these discs. So the 3 types of optical this shown here are usually the same size.

702
01:28:40.739 --> 01:28:46.170
And look very similar, they're all flat round and have so called pits and lands.

703
01:28:46.170 --> 01:28:52.170
And at least 1 side that represent the zeros and ones that computers operator on.

704
01:28:52.170 --> 01:28:58.680
Which are read by laser however, there are physical differences in the construction and materials used.

705
01:28:58.680 --> 01:29:01.859
Which affect how much information can be stored on them.

706
01:29:01.859 --> 01:29:11.520
Which are important to the user because the user needs a device with the right kind of drive to play a given disk. So, 1 thing that we had hoped to get with the move.

707
01:29:11.520 --> 01:29:18.300
From the general material designation of to is content carrier media types.

708
01:29:18.300 --> 01:29:32.904
Was the separation of content and carrier and RPA is is an improvement in this area that has not completely succeeded in avoiding the mixing of content and carrier optical disc provide an excellent example of the conflation of

709
01:29:32.904 --> 01:29:34.795
content strictly physical.

710
01:29:35.159 --> 01:29:41.760
Characteristics of a carrier add before Darwin any further into this question.

711
01:29:41.760 --> 01:29:52.380
We'll have 1 more pull, which is, what do you think they're already a media carrier types are for the disk shown on the slide.

712
01:30:41.189 --> 01:30:49.680
Okay, well we have a range of of.

713
01:30:49.680 --> 01:30:58.229
Responses so I'm going to talk about this because this is actually a very using area.

714
01:30:58.229 --> 01:31:11.039
So this is 1 place where tangible digital resources get really tricky. All of the this shown on this slide are the same in terms of the type of described needed to read them.

715
01:31:11.039 --> 01:31:14.760
In purely physical terms they are all the same carrier.

716
01:31:14.760 --> 01:31:18.600
Well, except the is constructed slightly differently.

717
01:31:18.600 --> 01:31:22.890
But, basically they're the same.

718
01:31:22.890 --> 01:31:26.460
Standard of disk.

719
01:31:26.460 --> 01:31:30.300
And when people hear that work, they usually think of movies.

720
01:31:30.300 --> 01:31:36.000
And this is what we have in the upper right corner a typical mass produced TV video.

721
01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:41.399
But this is a D. V. D. and it has audio visual information coded on it according to a.

722
01:31:41.399 --> 01:31:46.649
A specific standard that enables it to be read by stand alone DVD players.

723
01:31:46.649 --> 01:31:50.939
Already considers this type of disk to have a video of this carrier.

724
01:31:50.939 --> 01:32:01.109
And a media type of video to the left of it is a DVD audio disk. This is physically the exact same carrier as the DVD video.

725
01:32:01.109 --> 01:32:06.479
But it has audio content and coded on it according to the DVD audio standard.

726
01:32:06.479 --> 01:32:11.009
So, rba considers this type of disc to have an audio is carrier.

727
01:32:11.009 --> 01:32:20.158
And immediate type of audio in the bottom left, we have a video game on TV that is meant to be played at a PC.

728
01:32:25.649 --> 01:32:33.958
And although this is statistically again, the exact same carrier already considers this 1.

729
01:32:33.958 --> 01:32:44.309
To have that computer does carrier and computer media type in the bottom, right? We have another DVD that has 2 dimensional, moving image content that it.

730
01:32:44.309 --> 01:32:47.338
But it cannot be played on a standalone player.

731
01:32:47.338 --> 01:32:52.408
The video content isn't coded in time and requires a computer deploy.

732
01:32:52.408 --> 01:32:58.769
In this case already consider the D tab a computer disk carrier and computer media type.

733
01:32:58.769 --> 01:33:09.479
Like, the video game, and not like the movie. So on the top left is a picture of a blank DVD artist that doesn't have any content recorded on it yet.

734
01:33:09.479 --> 01:33:13.048
Given the way that splits up the universe.

735
01:33:13.048 --> 01:33:16.918
It is impossible to determine what the media carrier type is.

736
01:33:16.918 --> 01:33:22.948
Until what has content so that last poll was kind of a trick question, cause they.

737
01:33:22.948 --> 01:33:26.128
The actual answer is D, I don't know.

738
01:33:26.128 --> 01:33:29.309
Um, because there wasn't enough information given.

739
01:33:29.309 --> 01:33:37.288
Unless, you know, what kind of content is written on the DVD are you don't actually know what the.

740
01:33:37.288 --> 01:33:41.668
Carrier and media types are.

741
01:33:46.229 --> 01:33:52.588
So, what is a DVD are anyway, according to a PC Mac it is a type of right once.

742
01:33:52.588 --> 01:33:57.988
Dbd disk how does this fit into an descriptions?

743
01:33:57.988 --> 01:34:05.969
So, I think of this as sort of an Easter egg element in rba, because if you didn't already, you know, it was there, you'd never find it.

744
01:34:05.969 --> 01:34:10.588
Has a production method element.

745
01:34:10.588 --> 01:34:14.729
Which describes the process is used to produce the manifestation.

746
01:34:14.729 --> 01:34:18.238
Most of the things in the rba controlled vocabulary.

747
01:34:18.238 --> 01:34:26.488
Are things like engraving and photocopying because lasers used to write information on the surface of recruitable optical discs.

748
01:34:26.488 --> 01:34:30.118
They fall into the already a category of burning.

749
01:34:30.118 --> 01:34:34.109
So this is what you do when you use the optical describe on your computer.

750
01:34:34.109 --> 01:34:37.708
To write data to a CD or DVD.

751
01:34:37.708 --> 01:34:48.389
Other relevant value in the audio production method vocabulary is staffing, which is used for mass produced discs, made in a factory.

752
01:34:48.389 --> 01:34:54.389
Staffing is only economical if you're making a large enough number of discs that are all the same.

753
01:34:54.389 --> 01:34:58.828
So, DVDs have popular major motion pictures are stamped.

754
01:34:58.828 --> 01:35:04.439
But DVD videos from these educational publishers are likely burnt.

755
01:35:04.439 --> 01:35:08.849
And why is this information important? There are a couple reasons.

756
01:35:08.849 --> 01:35:12.779
1, is that burn? This can be more problematic to play.

757
01:35:12.779 --> 01:35:20.939
For example, some older DVD players don't play so this can be helpful information for public services.

758
01:35:20.939 --> 01:35:25.259
When cratchey, the old professors with ancient DVD players complain.

759
01:35:25.259 --> 01:35:33.328
That such and such DV doesn't work. This can be also useful information for a couple of collection development and preservation.

760
01:35:33.328 --> 01:35:37.708
Because recorded this generally don't last as long as stamped discs.

761
01:35:43.288 --> 01:35:47.399
And many times the disk itself will tell you what it is.

762
01:35:47.399 --> 01:35:53.849
But in the absence of that information, there are a couple ways to tell if you're looking at a stamp burn disk.

763
01:35:53.849 --> 01:35:58.229
1, is that I've shown on the right normally if you look at the bottom of the disk.

764
01:35:58.229 --> 01:36:03.298
You can see a difference between the area where data has been written and the blank areas.

765
01:36:03.298 --> 01:36:08.759
If it's a burnt disk, whereas the surface of a stamp to this will be uniform.

766
01:36:08.759 --> 01:36:13.979
In addition underneath have recorded, this usually has a greenish or purplish tent.

767
01:36:13.979 --> 01:36:19.979
The main exception that I've read about are some that are designed to look like.

768
01:36:19.979 --> 01:36:24.569
But you hopefully are not acquiring for your library.

769
01:36:24.569 --> 01:36:29.849
There's no audio controlled vocabulary for specific types of front desk.

770
01:36:29.849 --> 01:36:34.109
But if you have this information, you can put it in a 538. now.

771
01:36:34.109 --> 01:36:40.588
Some catalogs like to preface this note with a phrase disc characteristics.

772
01:36:42.269 --> 01:36:46.529
And also times the disc itself will tell you exactly what it is.

773
01:36:46.529 --> 01:36:50.038
But if not, there are various free programs that will tell you.

774
01:36:50.038 --> 01:36:54.059
Here's some sample output from 1 of them on the far left.

775
01:36:54.059 --> 01:36:59.639
Never mass produced DVD of a popular movie. It's a stamped video disk.

776
01:36:59.639 --> 01:37:07.259
Which is represented by the D. V. D. ROM and the media type and book type fields.

777
01:37:07.259 --> 01:37:13.559
The content type shows, DVD video, the middle example is a burned DVD video.

778
01:37:13.559 --> 01:37:17.338
In the media type and book type, it shows.

779
01:37:17.338 --> 01:37:23.069
But like that mass produced DVD video desk, it shows the content type of DVD video.

780
01:37:23.069 --> 01:37:28.259
The final example could be almost any kind of content on a mass produced disc.

781
01:37:28.259 --> 01:37:33.628
Including that quick time instructional video that I.

782
01:37:33.628 --> 01:37:39.838
Showed earlier that media type of book type show that it was stamped in a factory.

783
01:37:39.838 --> 01:37:43.198
But the content type shows data.

784
01:37:47.729 --> 01:37:55.679
These are just some more examples that you might want to look at later and here are some links to several free programs.

785
01:37:55.679 --> 01:37:59.368
That will help you identify optical types.

786
01:37:59.368 --> 01:38:05.248
So, circling back to the way it treats these this differently.

787
01:38:05.248 --> 01:38:11.338
The key is the way that the content is encoded and what type of device you need to play that content.

788
01:38:11.338 --> 01:38:18.628
At least that's my best interpretation of what our is trying to get at is the device that you play that.

789
01:38:18.628 --> 01:38:21.899
Content back on a dedicated.

790
01:38:21.899 --> 01:38:31.618
Playback device or a computer. The challenge is in my mind there really aren't 2 binary categories, computer and computer.

791
01:38:31.618 --> 01:38:37.378
But rather I continuum, we have a fairly all Blu, Ray player.

792
01:38:37.378 --> 01:38:42.298
Which came and stopped with some software to play Netflix.

793
01:38:43.378 --> 01:38:47.399
Amazon Prime YouTube, and some other streaming videos.

794
01:38:47.399 --> 01:38:51.748
Does that mean that you 2 works with a 9 computer playback device?

795
01:38:51.748 --> 01:38:57.208
And it turns out that the company that made the Blu, Ray player is no longer updating that software.

796
01:38:57.208 --> 01:39:03.479
So, now, if you try to play YouTube videos on it, you get a message that the app is no longer supported.

797
01:39:05.069 --> 01:39:11.698
So the line between sort of a standalone hard wired playback device.

798
01:39:11.698 --> 01:39:15.509
And a computer is kind of blurry.

799
01:39:15.509 --> 01:39:20.399
However, optical, this should be considered computer disk with computer content.

800
01:39:20.399 --> 01:39:23.458
Unless they have been encoded with 1 of the formats.

801
01:39:23.458 --> 01:39:26.729
That already treats is special because they can be played.

802
01:39:26.729 --> 01:39:32.998
The playback devices, which I would define as dedicated mass, produced, hard coded equipment.

803
01:39:32.998 --> 01:39:44.338
And as I mentioned before, already used to have a controlled vocabulary under digital coding formats, and the list was problematic. In some ways, they can still be helpful.

804
01:39:44.338 --> 01:39:47.519
And some of these things are file types and some of them.

805
01:39:47.519 --> 01:39:52.019
More like ways to organize content, particularly on optical discs.

806
01:39:52.019 --> 01:39:59.878
Were used by a specialized playback machines, and the ones that are considered to have non computer media types.

807
01:39:59.878 --> 01:40:06.208
Are these ones that can be used in mass produced specialized equipment?

808
01:40:08.099 --> 01:40:13.048
If you navigate to the video on your computer.

809
01:40:13.048 --> 01:40:19.529
In the file system, you'll see, it always has the same kind of file structure.

810
01:40:19.529 --> 01:40:23.908
It is the standardized types of files and the way they are arranged on the disc.

811
01:40:23.908 --> 01:40:29.578
It enables DVD players to recognize and interpret the content of a DVD video.

812
01:40:29.578 --> 01:40:35.819
Is there a couple of quotes that may be helpful and understanding.

813
01:40:35.819 --> 01:40:38.998
I know I've gone on about these differences at Mike.

814
01:40:38.998 --> 01:40:42.298
But I found that many people find this confusing.

815
01:40:42.298 --> 01:40:48.118
Not least because in casual conversation, they use these terms much less. Precisely.

816
01:41:00.238 --> 01:41:05.639
1st, quote list some file types versus what it costs playback formats.

817
01:41:05.639 --> 01:41:09.719
Which include the formats that does not consider computer based.

818
01:41:09.719 --> 01:41:17.548
The 2nd, 1 spells out the DVD videos, the type of leaving me wrong here again is a potential point of confusion.

819
01:41:17.548 --> 01:41:20.969
The wrong terms, like D. V. D ROM and CD ROM.

820
01:41:20.969 --> 01:41:28.948
Can be used to indicate a stamp disk where data was added in a factory setting in contrast to burn is like.

821
01:41:28.948 --> 01:41:33.118
However, they can also be used as a general umbrella term.

822
01:41:33.118 --> 01:41:39.029
Or a disk type as it is used here or to mean, any type of data disk.

823
01:41:39.029 --> 01:41:45.929
I had disc where data is not encoded in 1 of the special encoding formats like video.

824
01:41:45.929 --> 01:41:49.139
All right and we have 1 more poll question.

825
01:41:49.139 --> 01:41:54.599
What are do you think the media and carrier type are for an MP? 3? Cdd.

826
01:42:55.349 --> 01:43:02.668
Okay, well, fortunately for you that music library association has already thought about this and answered this question for you.

827
01:43:02.668 --> 01:43:08.399
And they consider it to be an audio disc.

828
01:43:08.399 --> 01:43:14.729
So, remember that if it's not a tangible computer, a carrier.

829
01:43:14.729 --> 01:43:17.819
You shouldn't use queue and form.

830
01:43:17.819 --> 01:43:23.609
And when trying to identify the correct digital and sound characteristics for ideal carriers.

831
01:43:23.609 --> 01:43:29.939
That music library associations, supplement to their best practices, which is linked from the bottom of this slide.

832
01:43:29.939 --> 01:43:35.158
Is very helpful and basically, their argument is that.

833
01:43:35.158 --> 01:43:40.288
Will play in the at least some regular CD players.

834
01:43:41.849 --> 01:43:48.809
Haven't haven't talked about media and carrier type. Let's talk about the content types.

835
01:43:48.809 --> 01:43:54.599
There are a few content types in R. D. that only apply to digital resources that you should be aware of.

836
01:43:54.599 --> 01:43:58.378
2 of them are data sets, which must be digital encoded.

837
01:43:58.378 --> 01:44:05.219
And are intended to be processed by a computer. There's 1 for computer playing computer data sets.

838
01:44:05.219 --> 01:44:09.418
And 1, where rapid data sets are pulled out separately.

839
01:44:17.038 --> 01:44:25.529
The other content type to keep in mind is computer program.

840
01:44:25.529 --> 01:44:30.328
Already defines this as content expressed in digitally coded instructions.

841
01:44:30.328 --> 01:44:33.569
Intended to be processed and performed by a computer.

842
01:44:33.569 --> 01:44:37.859
That includes things like Windows, Microsoft Office and video games.

843
01:44:37.859 --> 01:44:44.248
There's also 1 Mark record type that is only ever used with computer carriers.

844
01:44:44.248 --> 01:44:50.248
If you've been cataloging for, as long as I have email, remember a time when everything on a computer carrier.

845
01:44:50.248 --> 01:44:59.548
Or what ACR, to used to call a computer file was put on a type and record after a while. There was such a proliferation of electronic resources.

846
01:44:59.548 --> 01:45:05.519
That that became my tenable and the mark format was changed. So that record type is based on content.

847
01:45:05.519 --> 01:45:09.179
And record type M, was more narrowly defined to food.

848
01:45:09.179 --> 01:45:13.288
Only those types of resources that couldn't be put on another record type.

849
01:45:13.288 --> 01:45:20.279
And this includes, in fact, computer software, computer, oriented, multimedia and online systems for agents.

850
01:45:20.279 --> 01:45:27.208
And this is just something from the mark format documentation in that same topic.

851
01:45:27.208 --> 01:45:30.298
So, occasionally you might not be sure.

852
01:45:30.298 --> 01:45:33.689
What record type to use in this case the mark format.

853
01:45:33.689 --> 01:45:40.979
Tells you to default to, em, there are also some situations where there isn't a predominant content type.

854
01:45:40.979 --> 01:45:44.788
For example, if you have a, that has conference presentations on it.

855
01:45:44.788 --> 01:45:48.569
And it has both and audio and video version of each presentation.

856
01:45:48.569 --> 01:45:53.368
Then you could put it on type because there isn't a single predominant type.

857
01:45:59.488 --> 01:46:07.859
Type of computer file is it fixed fields associated with type M records?

858
01:46:07.859 --> 01:46:11.009
It has the possible values listed on this slide.

859
01:46:11.009 --> 01:46:14.729
You should you see representational.

860
01:46:14.729 --> 01:46:18.389
We're still images, moving images and carded graphic images.

861
01:46:18.389 --> 01:46:22.948
And am again, is the default for mixed content or if you don't know.

862
01:46:22.948 --> 01:46:30.628
So, all that best practices for catalogue and video games, recommend that you use.

863
01:46:30.628 --> 01:46:35.248
2 content types to the moving image and computer program.

864
01:46:35.248 --> 01:46:38.488
On a type and file record for video games.

865
01:46:38.488 --> 01:46:45.719
And if you're not aware of it, I highly recommend these 2 resources for video, but game cataloging from.

866
01:46:45.719 --> 01:46:50.248
That video game, best practices and the video game. Sean vocabulary.

867
01:46:50.248 --> 01:46:57.658
And 1 more sneak peek at the new. It includes a new element called interactivity.

868
01:46:57.658 --> 01:47:03.929
Which defines as a capacity of content to respond to actions performed by the user.

869
01:47:03.929 --> 01:47:09.658
And this is likely to be useful video games and other digital content.

870
01:47:09.658 --> 01:47:13.798
So, now I'd like to walk to a fairly straightforward example.

871
01:47:13.798 --> 01:47:20.248
Of a PDF of conference proceedings, and a CD around that Mark record type is based on content.

872
01:47:20.248 --> 01:47:25.649
A, for text, because it's a data disk and not 1 of the special playback formats.

873
01:47:25.649 --> 01:47:30.868
A form fixed should be coded queue or direct electronic storage.

874
01:47:30.868 --> 01:47:37.109
On a tangible medium and the record type is not M, for computer file.

875
01:47:37.109 --> 01:47:41.878
Recommends adding as yours or 6 to record the computer file aspects.

876
01:47:41.878 --> 01:47:51.868
And you will also mark 7 for the CD ROM and most of the values are the same for all 3 of the types.

877
01:47:51.868 --> 01:48:00.899
I've discussed right and the only ones that vary for different desks are color and sound.

878
01:48:00.899 --> 01:48:03.958
There are more values that you can code for this 7.

879
01:48:03.958 --> 01:48:08.189
But they aren't required, and they're very useful for most materials.

880
01:48:08.189 --> 01:48:12.689
So that content carrier and media types.

881
01:48:12.689 --> 01:48:16.378
For that PDF.

882
01:48:16.378 --> 01:48:19.559
Hassan CD 1.

883
01:48:19.559 --> 01:48:23.788
For extent, you can either use a term from the list of carrier types.

884
01:48:23.788 --> 01:48:31.498
That is 1 computer optical disk where you can follow the alternative and use determined common usage 1 CDROM.

885
01:48:31.498 --> 01:48:35.429
The policy statements allow either.

886
01:48:35.429 --> 01:48:39.029
I tend to prefer that common usage terms as they convey.

887
01:48:39.029 --> 01:48:48.868
More information to the end user, and our da tells you to record the dimensions and centimeters, but the policy statements say to use inches for disks.

888
01:48:48.868 --> 01:49:00.179
And again, lists the number of digital file characteristics that you can record, and the ones that you're most likely to use her file type and encoding format.

889
01:49:00.179 --> 01:49:04.828
Some video games do you have regional encoding?

890
01:49:04.828 --> 01:49:08.878
And you may also wish to give it equipment or system or prior my note.

891
01:49:08.878 --> 01:49:14.759
And often this information appears on a container or package it.

892
01:49:16.439 --> 01:49:22.109
And for video games, the video game, best practice also suggest.

893
01:49:22.109 --> 01:49:25.469
Consider it a 753 for the platform.

894
01:49:25.469 --> 01:49:31.469
In that sort of standardized vocabulary in addition to the 538.

895
01:49:31.469 --> 01:49:37.469
At some of these can get very long and involved.

896
01:49:37.469 --> 01:49:41.429
Because the policy statement.

897
01:49:41.429 --> 01:49:47.399
Says to use the alternative and I of an I read the label for direct access computer resources.

898
01:49:47.399 --> 01:49:51.868
Except for moving images, you should prefer the title on the label.

899
01:49:51.868 --> 01:49:58.769
And in all cases it's required, or a good idea to give a note on the source of the title.

900
01:49:58.769 --> 01:50:02.488
And to be generous with your alternative titles.

901
01:50:02.488 --> 01:50:11.458
So, how about the USB flash drive again? There's no standardized standalone playback device for these.

902
01:50:11.458 --> 01:50:19.529
So, I would treat them as tangible computer carriers from a cataloging standpoint. They're pretty much like optical.

903
01:50:19.529 --> 01:50:22.889
Except they have a different shape and can potentially be.

904
01:50:22.889 --> 01:50:29.998
Weed right.

905
01:50:33.509 --> 01:50:38.099
So again, record type and content varies based on content.

906
01:50:38.099 --> 01:50:42.779
And forms should be queue for direct access, computer resources.

907
01:50:42.779 --> 01:50:51.149
The media type is computer and the carrier type is computer chip cartridge.

908
01:50:55.019 --> 01:50:58.588
So, although you could say it, 1 computer.

909
01:50:58.588 --> 01:51:05.998
Chip cartridge here I would definitely prefer the term and companies ask for dimensions.

910
01:51:05.998 --> 01:51:09.538
Already appears to say to record.

911
01:51:09.538 --> 01:51:14.338
So, banks at the side of the cartridge, that is to be inserted into the machine.

912
01:51:14.338 --> 01:51:17.458
The example, and for computer cartridges.

913
01:51:17.458 --> 01:51:22.109
Get 10 centimeters as the dimensions of some sort of computer chip cartridge.

914
01:51:22.109 --> 01:51:26.939
So, that makes it seem to me, like, you would have a very short light pier for us to be.

915
01:51:26.939 --> 01:51:31.948
Drives many of the records I found in actually give 2 dimensions.

916
01:51:31.948 --> 01:51:37.319
Which I can see how that could be helpful since USB drive to come in so many shapes.

917
01:51:37.319 --> 01:51:44.609
But it does literally seem to say, just measure the side that goes into the computer.

918
01:51:44.609 --> 01:51:50.698
And you may also want to give a system requirements notes.

919
01:51:50.698 --> 01:51:58.588
Sometimes vendors list B drives or DVDs or hard drives.

920
01:51:58.588 --> 01:52:01.979
Or other storage devices with the intention.

921
01:52:01.979 --> 01:52:08.038
Of the library loading it onto a local server for their users.

922
01:52:08.038 --> 01:52:11.668
In this case, you may want to catalog the right version.

923
01:52:11.668 --> 01:52:17.038
Rather than the tangible carrier, this is likely to be less confusing for your users.

924
01:52:17.038 --> 01:52:21.868
And is essentially a local reproduction, like locally hosted streaming videos.

925
01:52:21.868 --> 01:52:25.859
Described earlier in the presentation.

926
01:52:25.859 --> 01:52:31.679
And for all tangible digital resources, but especially for the following section, stay tuned.

927
01:52:31.679 --> 01:52:34.859
As more authoritative information is coming.

928
01:52:34.859 --> 01:52:38.368
All lack of the music library association have a task force.

929
01:52:38.368 --> 01:52:41.998
That is working on this and the goal of providing.

930
01:52:41.998 --> 01:52:46.109
Clear guidance for a variety of tangible digital carriers.

931
01:52:50.368 --> 01:52:55.559
And I see, we're running out of time. I was going to have 1 more question, but I think we'll skip it.

932
01:52:55.559 --> 01:52:59.099
This is a play away view and.

933
01:52:59.099 --> 01:53:05.759
Play always have been an area where this media and carrier type have been quite controversial.

934
01:53:05.759 --> 01:53:09.509
And since I originally did the slide for something else, apparently.

935
01:53:09.509 --> 01:53:12.868
They've discontinued the way view, but them.

936
01:53:12.868 --> 01:53:16.259
Principle is kind of the same the principle of the question.

937
01:53:16.259 --> 01:53:20.219
And the answer is that we'll have to wait for the official answer.

938
01:53:20.219 --> 01:53:23.219
My own inclination is to consider it.

939
01:53:23.219 --> 01:53:26.519
A stand alone video.

940
01:53:26.519 --> 01:53:30.988
Playback device and put it under video and other, but.

941
01:53:30.988 --> 01:53:37.918
All that does have some preliminary recommendations and their preliminary recommendations.

942
01:53:37.918 --> 01:53:42.719
Or to use both audio and computer as media type.

943
01:53:42.719 --> 01:53:45.719
And then other is carrier with 1 audio, meaning.

944
01:53:45.719 --> 01:53:49.679
Yeah, a player in the 300.

945
01:53:49.679 --> 01:53:53.668
If you look at the play away at vendor, CAD and logging.

946
01:53:53.668 --> 01:53:57.029
They call it audio plus.

947
01:53:57.029 --> 01:54:03.628
Which there was an argument on the list a long time ago that they should be considered an mediated.

948
01:54:03.628 --> 01:54:06.748
Because the user doesn't have to get a device.

949
01:54:06.748 --> 01:54:10.439
To play them.

950
01:54:10.439 --> 01:54:14.609
And I think this is kind of the wrong way to look at it.

951
01:54:14.609 --> 01:54:21.658
Because you still there is some mediation going on, even though it's transparent to the end user.

952
01:54:21.658 --> 01:54:28.498
That bits and bites have to be transformed in some way and you do actually have to know.

953
01:54:28.498 --> 01:54:37.109
Have a battery or something charged up for it to work. So what makes the situation here unusual? Is that the intermediation device.

954
01:54:37.109 --> 01:54:40.408
Is an extra combined combined with the carrier.

955
01:54:40.408 --> 01:54:43.948
And I have a few more slides.

956
01:54:43.948 --> 01:54:48.359
About the olack preliminary recommendations.

957
01:54:48.359 --> 01:54:51.809
Which I don't really have anything to say about.

958
01:54:51.809 --> 01:54:55.769
So, I guess maybe I'll stop here and if people have any.

959
01:54:56.213 --> 01:55:04.854
Last questions for the last couple minutes Thank you so much. Kelly McKenzie go ahead and click on the raise hand.

960
01:55:04.854 --> 01:55:11.363
If you want to ask a question through your microphone, you can also type questions into chat.

961
01:55:15.179 --> 01:55:19.529
This has been a fascinating have learned a lot to to say Kelly, thank you so much.

962
01:55:19.529 --> 01:55:22.679
I am looking for.

963
01:55:22.679 --> 01:55:27.149
Raise hands or checked in questions.

964
01:55:28.679 --> 01:55:32.578
This makes me feel fortunate that I'm mainly catalogue music.

965
01:55:32.578 --> 01:55:41.009
And tangible music I don't have to do it with a lot of this. It is it is very, very gray, isn't it?

966
01:55:41.009 --> 01:55:46.618
Well, that's kind of the challenge I thought, you know.

967
01:55:46.618 --> 01:55:52.229
I tend to be a person that has a hard time seeing things in black and white anyway but of course.

968
01:55:52.229 --> 01:56:03.868
You know, I think a lot of times when people come to these presentations, they want somebody to tell them what the answer is. And I'm not very good at that. It's like, wow, you could look at it this way. You could look at it that way.

969
01:56:03.868 --> 01:56:11.189
So, I sort of inherent in the media, I think.

970
01:56:11.189 --> 01:56:25.979
You know, somewhat helpful, despite the fact that it wasn't definitive in many areas. Absolutely. At least I appreciated you presenting choices so you could do it this way or that way.

971
01:56:25.979 --> 01:56:30.929
And, you know, think about what's good to convey the most for the end user.

972
01:56:30.929 --> 01:56:36.809
And and help them choose what it is, they want, um.

973
01:56:36.809 --> 01:56:41.338
I believe we don't have any questions.

974
01:56:41.338 --> 01:56:52.559
Um, but again, thank you very much colleague. I learned a lot this afternoon. I hope everyone else did too based on the chat that was going on. I would say absolutely.

975
01:56:52.559 --> 01:57:00.359
All right, well, thank you everybody for sticking with it til the end and I hope you enjoy the rest of the conference.

976
01:57:00.359 --> 01:57:04.469
Thank you so much collie take care.

977
01:57:04.469 --> 01:57:07.859
5.