Creative Events/Original Events
I have previously argued (Endres, 1987) that allowing original literature in forensics oral interpretation is a bad thing. While I remain true to that sentiment, my focus of blame is shifting from the act itself to the state of the activity, i.e. it seems that lack of policy is the primary culprit which allows the use of original literature to impugn forensics integrity. The primary focus of this essay is on the ethical concerns surrounding the use of original literature, and how the introduction of policy may help preclude unethical behavior. This analysis will first recap arguments from my previous essay, then address ethics from both a pragmatic and philosophical stance, and conclude with justification for policy development.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
In Copyright https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
Endres, Thomas G.
"Maintaining Integrity II: Further Thoughts on Ethics and Original Literature,"
Proceedings of the National Developmental Conference on Individual Events: Vol. 1
, Article 6.
Available at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/ndcieproceedings/vol1/iss1/6