A Comparison Among Three Sampling Methods to Calculate Biotic Integrity in the Greater Blue Earth River Basin

Location

CSU Ballroom

Start Date

21-4-2008 1:00 PM

End Date

21-4-2008 3:00 PM

Student's Major

Biological Sciences

Student's College

Science, Engineering and Technology

Mentor's Name

Shannon J. Fisher

Mentor's Department

Biological Sciences

Mentor's College

Science, Engineering and Technology

Description

The Blue Earth River watershed in south central Minnesota has been dramatically impacted by the surrounding land use. Consequently, high sediment loads and degraded water quality are the outcomes. To gauge stream health, benthic macroinvertebrates and ichthyofauna (fish) may be utilized as biotic indicators because they respond to changes, both positive and negative, in the aquatic environment. We compared fish and macroinvertebrate Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) methods at several different sites within the Blue Earth River watershed to determine if one method could serve as an efficient and reliable technique. Macroinvertebrates were collected using Hester-Dendy artificial substrate samplers and d-frame dipnets. Fish were collected by fall electrofishing. Data were analyzed and IBIs were calculated using the EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocol. Early results suggest that IBI values are significantly different among the three methods and that macroinvertebrate IBIs are more practical to use when comparing a wide variety of stream orders.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 21st, 1:00 PM Apr 21st, 3:00 PM

A Comparison Among Three Sampling Methods to Calculate Biotic Integrity in the Greater Blue Earth River Basin

CSU Ballroom

The Blue Earth River watershed in south central Minnesota has been dramatically impacted by the surrounding land use. Consequently, high sediment loads and degraded water quality are the outcomes. To gauge stream health, benthic macroinvertebrates and ichthyofauna (fish) may be utilized as biotic indicators because they respond to changes, both positive and negative, in the aquatic environment. We compared fish and macroinvertebrate Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) methods at several different sites within the Blue Earth River watershed to determine if one method could serve as an efficient and reliable technique. Macroinvertebrates were collected using Hester-Dendy artificial substrate samplers and d-frame dipnets. Fish were collected by fall electrofishing. Data were analyzed and IBIs were calculated using the EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocol. Early results suggest that IBI values are significantly different among the three methods and that macroinvertebrate IBIs are more practical to use when comparing a wide variety of stream orders.

Recommended Citation

Fett, James H.. "A Comparison Among Three Sampling Methods to Calculate Biotic Integrity in the Greater Blue Earth River Basin." Undergraduate Research Symposium, Mankato, MN, April 21, 2008.
https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/urs/2008/poster-session-B/5