Abstract

Drug courts are an important component in the criminal justice system directed toward efforts of rehabilitation of drug and alcohol addiction that lessens the rate of recidivism. Drug court is the alternative to incarceration and traditional addiction treatment. Drug court has been characterized as therapeutic adjudication. Using "Best Practices," drug courts staffed by a judge, court team, and community partners individualize treatment protocols to motivate participant compliance and lessen the impact of the social milieu that impacts his or her recovery. Drug courts have been deemed successful in part due to the role of the judge. This research sought to compare theoretical consideration of bureaucratic authority and the ethic of care to the actions of the judge that produced narratives of positive praise of drug court participants' success in their program. Literature on adult drug courts in the United States found that recidivism rates were reduced when the drug court participant's length of stay in the program was at least one year and they stayed engaged in the program with the help of the judge.

Advisor

Leah Rogne

First Committee Member

William F. Wagner

Second Committee Member

Jasper S. Hunt

Date of Degree

2013

Language

english

Document Type

APP

Degree

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Sociology and Corrections

College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.