Scholars in the forensics community have been lamenting the misuse and abuse of evidence in forensics competition for decades. Beginning with Frank’s 1983 discussion of evidentiary abuse in Persuasive speaking, authors have offered possible solutions to end the problem. However, as the ongoing focus might suggest, these solutions have not had the intended effect. In this paper, we continue the investigation into evidence use in Persuasive speaking by repeating Frank’s original study but offer an unusual solution that may finally effectively address the problem.
Mendes, A. (2014). Abuse of Evidence in Persuasive Speaking: An Un-Conventional Solution. National Forensic Journal, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.56816/0749-1042.1050