Using the Contradiction Paradigm to Assess Ageism
Ageism is an important topic in our society, considering the burgeoning older adult population. Ageism is often measured using explicit questionnaires; however, given the impact of social desirability, implicit measures of ageism have been developed. In this study, the contradiction paradigm, an implicit measure of stereotypes (Lassonde, under review) was used to measure age-related stereotypes in passages describing older adults. Participants read passages with target sentences more slowly when these sentences described behaviors that were inconsistent rather than consistent with age-related stereotypes. Participants also completed a series of self-report questionnaires measuring ageism. Results demonstrated that reading times using the contradiction paradigm were not related to outcomes on the self-report questionnaires. A comparison of the contradiction paradigm to a social desirability scale revealed that it was not vulnerable to social desirability. This confirms the contradiction paradigm's use as an implicit measure of age-related stereotypes. Although there is no clear relation between the contradiction paradigm and popular explicit measures, a next important step would be to determine the point in which implicit knowledge and intentional behavioral responses interact.
Journal of Aging Studies
Lassonde, K.A., Surla, C., Buchanan, J.A., & O'Brien, E.J. (2012). Using the Contradiction Paradigm to Assess Ageism. Journal of Aging Studies, 26(2), 174-181. doi. 10.1016/j.jaging.2011.12.002
Link to Publisher Version (DOI)
Publisher's Copyright and Source
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier, Inc. Article published by Elsevier, Inc. in Journal of Aging Studies, volume 26, issue number 2, April 2012, pages 174-181. Available online on December 3, 2011: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.12.002