Tracking the Defense of Marriage Act Of 1996: A Feminist Look Into the Congressional Debates

Location

CSU

Student's Major

Gender and Women's Studies

Student's College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Mentor's Name

Carol Perkins

Mentor's Department

Gender and Women's Studies

Mentor's College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Description

The question guiding my research was; What arguments were used in the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)? My methodology in completing this research included qualitative and quantitative analyses of the arguments derived from all House and Senate transcriptions of the DOMA debates. To narrow the size and scope of the research, I focused on six major lines of congressional debate: political, moral, definitional, economic, legal, and behavioral. I discovered that a congress person's party affiliation, the state they were representing, their gender, and their sexual orientation were key factors in the types of debates they used. Based on these discoveries, I discussed effective ways to refine and present arguments in favor of same-sex marriage than those presented to Congress in order to fail DOMA in 1996.1 argue that rather than gays/ lesbians proceeding with efforts to legalize same-sex marriage, there are other avenues which could prove more fruitful, such as seeking inclusion of same-sex relationships in the federal definition of "family" to enable gays/lesbians to partake of benefits afforded to currently defined families.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Tracking the Defense of Marriage Act Of 1996: A Feminist Look Into the Congressional Debates

CSU

The question guiding my research was; What arguments were used in the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)? My methodology in completing this research included qualitative and quantitative analyses of the arguments derived from all House and Senate transcriptions of the DOMA debates. To narrow the size and scope of the research, I focused on six major lines of congressional debate: political, moral, definitional, economic, legal, and behavioral. I discovered that a congress person's party affiliation, the state they were representing, their gender, and their sexual orientation were key factors in the types of debates they used. Based on these discoveries, I discussed effective ways to refine and present arguments in favor of same-sex marriage than those presented to Congress in order to fail DOMA in 1996.1 argue that rather than gays/ lesbians proceeding with efforts to legalize same-sex marriage, there are other avenues which could prove more fruitful, such as seeking inclusion of same-sex relationships in the federal definition of "family" to enable gays/lesbians to partake of benefits afforded to currently defined families.