Differences in Dissonance Reduction Tendencies Between Low-Context and High-Context Cultures

Presenter Information

Jennifer Rye, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Location

CSU 201

Start Date

25-4-2005 8:30 AM

End Date

25-4-2005 10:00 AM

Student's Major

Psychology

Student's College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Mentor's Name

Kevin Filter

Mentor's Department

Psychology

Mentor's College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Description

This study tested the differences in dissonance reduction tendencies between low-context (American) and high-context (Asian) cultures. There currently have been many studies on the causes of cognitive dissonance and dissonance reduction tendencies. The tendency to justify or rationalize decisions is a part of human nature, but arises in culture-specific manners because specific cultures shape how and when rationalization occurs. The results of this study will be discussed in terms of the effects of personality feedback and interpersonal relationships on dissonance reduction tendencies. This study expects to find that when given negative personality feedback the Americans will have re-rated the posters more often, showing a greater need to justify their decisions. It is also anticipated that the personality feedback will have had no effect on dissonance reduction for the Asians because the situations did not threaten aspects of the interdependent self. When rating the posters for a friend the Asians will likely have re-rated the posters more often, showing a greater need to justify their decisions when choosing for others. The poster ratings for a friend or for self will likely have had no effect on dissonance reduction for Americans because the situations did not threaten the self-concept.