Abstract

Performance feedback is an effective intervention that improves the writing outcomes of elementary students. Although choice has been referred to as a powerful tool in improving the writing of students, little empirical research has been conducted that investigates the effectiveness of choice when implemented in a class-wide setting. Therefore, the current study used a randomized controlled trial design to compare the effects of performance feedback and choice on the writing fluency outcomes of 40 fourth-grade elementary students in one elementary school. Participants were randomly assigned to either a performance feedback condition (n = 20) or a choice condition (n = 20) for 4 weeks. Participants in the performance feedback condition demonstrated significant growth in their writing performance when compared to the writing performance of participants assigned to the choice condition. In addition, results found that participants’ higher levels of interest in the story starter predicted increased writing productivity. Limitations of the study; practice implications, including considerations for the use of writing interventions in a class-wide setting and the incorporation of student interest into writing topics; and future directions are discussed.

Advisor

Shawna Peterson-Brown

Committee Member

Kevin Filter

Committee Member

Alexandra Hilt-Panahon

Date of Degree

2024

Language

english

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree

Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)

Program of Study

School Psychology

Department

Psychology

College

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Share

COinS
 

Rights Statement

In Copyright