Best Practices in Utilizing the Changing Criterion Design

Authors

Liesa A. Klein, Minnesota State University, MankatoFollow
Daniel Houlihan, Minnesota State University, MankatoFollow
James Vincent, Minnesota State University, MankatoFollow
Carlos J. Panahon, Minnesota State University, MankatoFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Abstract

The changing criterion design (CCD) has been a recognized format of single-case research for four decades. Published examples of the CCD have been limited and the structure of the design used in the literature has varied to a degree that might engender confusion. This review examines the structure of CCD studies published to date to identify prior implementation practices and identify best practices for future use.

Department

Psychology

Publication Title

Behavioral Analysis in Practice

Recommended Citation

Klein, L. A., Houlihan, D., Vincent, J. L., & Panahon, C. J. (2017). Best practices in utilizing the changing criterion design. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(1), 52-61. doi:10.1007/s40617-014-0036-x

DOI

10.1007/s40617-014-0036-x

Link to Publisher Version (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0036-x

Publisher's Copyright and Source

Copyright © 2015 Association for Behavior Analysis International. Article published by Springer in Behavior Analysis in Practice, volume 10, issue 1, March 2017, pages 52-61. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-014-0036-x